Category Archives: reef conservation

Huffington Post: The Blog: To Fight Disease, Protect the Ocean

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-ellen-prager/to-fight-disease-protect-_b_6432038.html
Become a fanOcean Scientist, Author, Safina Center Fellow

Carl Safina Headshot
Become a fanAuthor and host, ‘Saving the Ocean’ on PBS

Posted: Updated:

2015-01-07-stcroixuw.jpg

Why should we curb ocean pollution, stop overfishing, prevent invasive species and save coral reefs?

Because the next wonder drug in the battle against some of our most insidious diseases, such as cancer or Alzheimer’s, may be lurking just beneath the waves!

The ocean covers nearly three-quarters of our planet and provides billions of people with a critical source of protein along with hundreds of millions of jobs and billions of dollars in economic revenue. The ocean is part of the Earth’s life support system, producing oxygen while absorbing carbon dioxide and heat. Simply put, our quality of life on the planet is inherently connected to the sea! And you’ve probably heard all of that before. Still not convinced?

Well, how about this: The ocean, in fact, may be the greatest reservoir of new, effective and as of yet, undiscovered pharmaceuticals. Already, there are eight approved drugs derived from marine chemicals that are being used to fight cancer, pain, viruses and inflammation. Another twelve compounds are in clinical trials with many more in the preclinical phase, these look to combat cancer, Alzheimer’s, viruses, asthma and to promote wound healing. And we’ve only explored some five percent of the ocean!

Why is the sea such a hotbed for potential drug discovery? Numerous organisms in the ocean lack big teeth or the ability to swim away from predators; instead they use chemicals for defense. Marine-derived compounds are also used to regulate bodily functions, produce light and harness energy.

Two of the most interesting candidates so far for drug discovery seem to be sponges and cone snails. Ziconotide, also known as Prialt, is an FDA approved non-opiate painkiller derived from the venom of a cone snail. For people addicted or allergic to morphine, this drug provides an effective alternative for pain relief. From sponges come the cancer-fighting drug Cytarabine, the antiviral medicine Vidarabine and many medications in the clinical and preclinical phases of testing. Compounds associated with tunicates, red algae, worms, bryozoans, soft corals, clams and sea hares are also being tested.

Many of the species of interest for drug discovery are found in coral reefs!

Scientists are also focusing on the ocean’s abundant and diverse microbial community. Many microbes live symbiotically within marine organisms and can produce chemical compounds. In addition to indentifying specific microbes or chemicals, scientists are trying to better understand their functions in the marine world. The hope is that this will lead to new lines of use in defense against cancer and other diseases.

The regeneration ability of organisms such as sea stars and sea cucumbers is another area of significant interest. One can only imagine what would come with unlocking of the secrets to regeneration of lost body parts or internal organs.

Numerous marine organisms are now also providing important models for biomedical research, biotechnology and ocean-derived compounds are making their way into the multi-billion dollar cosmetic industry. Seven marine-derived chemicals are already being used in cosmetics and more are being examined as part of innovative anti-aging solutions.

It is important to note that once discovered, natural chemical products must be either synthesized in the lab or the host organism produced in aquaculture to prevent overharvesting and the decline of wild populations.

Along with the world’s rainforests, the ocean harbors a plethora of potentially effective drugs to combat human ailments and greatly improve human health. Many of these pharmaceuticals remain undiscovered or are in the preliminary phase of testing. Yet across the globe, marine species and the compounds or microbes they host are at risk. Climate change, pollution, overfishing, loss of habitats and invasive species threaten the health of the ocean and its great diversity of life. The potential loss of species in the ocean is not just bad for the ocean; it is also a true loss for humankind.

How you can help:

• Support organizations, political representatives and policies working to protect and restore the ocean.
• Make the ocean a higher priority.
• Dispose of your trash properly and make sure your kids, neighbors and co-workers do the same. And recycle whenever possible.
• Spread the word that the ocean is important and needs our help.
• Eat sustainably caught or well-managed farmed seafood (http://safinacenter.org/seafoods/).
• Wash boats and fishing gear between uses to avoid transporting invasive species.
• Conserve energy and support efforts to recognize and combat climate change.
• Use your power as a consumer to support industries and restaurants that promote sustainability and environment-friendly policies.

Information presented here comes from Ellen Prager’s visit with scientists at FAU’s Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution (http://www.fau.edu/hboi/mbbr/), her previous research for the book, Sex, Drugs, and Sea Slime: The Oceans’ Oddest Creatures and Why They Matter, an excellent 2014 review by Martins, Vieira, Gaspar, and Santos in Marine Drugs (http://www.mdpi.com/1660-3397/12/2/1066), and Carl Safina’s book Song for the Blue Ocean.

Follow Dr. Ellen Prager on Twitter: www.twitter.com/elprager

Coral-List: National Marine Fisheries Service Proposes listing 3 corals as endangered

December 16th, 2014

Tomorrow, the National Marine Fisheries Service publishes a proposed
rule to list 3 corals (/Cantharellus noumeae, Siderastrea glynni,
/and/Tubastraea floreana/) as endangered under the Endangered Species
Act.  This finding is part of a wider finding on a petition to list 81
marine species.  Of that original 81 species there were 23 species of
coral.  In our 90-day finding on the petition on 25 October 2013 we
determined 20 of those 23 corals were not warranted for listing.
Tomorrow’s finding relates to the 3 remaining species.

The proposed listing of the three corals as endangered is consistent
with our recent listing of 20 corals as Threatened under the ESA. The
species being proposed tomorrow are found in fewer countries and
ecoregions and are subject to additional species-specific threats in
their small ranges.  Specifically, /Catharellus noumea/ occurs only in
New Caledonia and possibly Papua new Guinea, /Siderastrea glynni/ occurs
only in Panama where it currently only exists in captivity, and
/Tubastraea floreana/ is now known from only one site in the Galapagos
Islands.

As with all listing proposals, we seek information from interested
parties and the public on the status, threats, and conservation of these
species.  The public comment period will close on 17 February 2015.

Links to the petition, proposed rule (including the version that went on
public inspection today), and status reviews can be found on our website at:
http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/species/petition81.htm

Tomorrow the fully formatted version of the proposed rule and a link to
the public comment site will also be accessible from the above web page.

Please submit any comments or information through that site.

//

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~~~~~~~~~~~
Dwayne Meadows, Ph.D.
Species of Concern National Program Coordinator
Endangered Species Division
Office of Protected Resources (F/PR3)
National Marine Fisheries Service
1315 East West Highway
Silver Spring, MD 20910
(301) 427-8467
FAX: (301) 713-4060
Dwayne.Meadows@noaa.gov
http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/species/concern/

Coral-list: Coal of Thorns Greatest Threat to Australia’s Great Barrier Reef

Steve Palumbi and Iain McCalman has just released a conversation about the future of Australian and US reefs at blog site The Conversation: http://goo.gl/V6S9Uz

We especially raise alarm about coal mining in Australia and its effects. Selling cheap coal to China so their air gets worse and the GBR is damaged? Who would start this lose:lose scenario? The following is edited from our conversation:

Iain McCalman: Coal lies is the biggest current threats to the Great Barrier Reef. Our government likes selling cheap coal to China and India.
They are expanding existing coal ports on the Reef, a decision fraught with implications for the health of the Reef.
The new coal ports all entail extensive dredging where it would choke corals and sea grasses.

Short-sighted, the policy sacrifices one of the wonders of the world and a substantial economic asset for Australian tourism; and this at a time when even China is trying to wean itself from coal.

The Great Barrier Reef might be an icon for us in Australia, but we seem to have governments that are proud to be icon bashers.

Steve Palumbi: Iain McCalman’s book shows Captain Cook delicately threading his small ship up coral-filled canals. Now blast a modern coal ship through there,
and what would you expect to happen?

One of the last huge threats to the whole Great Barrier Reef was the crown of thorns starfish.
This voracious predator wasted reefs all along Australia.
Now, the dangers of mining and ports makes this new threat the Coal of Thorns.

The Coal of Thorns is an even bigger threat – because it is something the reef has never seen
and it is on a huge industrial scale. What happens after you hurt the reef, export the coal, and then China turns to their
vast supplies of natural gas? Dead reef and a dead exporting business.

When the coral-eating Crown of Thorns began in the 1960s, people tried everything to stop it.
Folks picked them up by the thousands and burned them.  They would have loved to have the problem solved by simply passing a law.

This threat from coal is a problem created specifically by people. And it could be solved by people in a way that was never available
for the starfish scourge – a simple sign of a pen could do away with this major threat.

******************************

****
Stephen R. Palumbi
Harold A Miller Director, Hopkins Marine Station
Jane and Marshall Steel Professor of Biology
Stanford University

_______________________________________________
Coral-List mailing list
Coral-List@coral.aoml.noaa.gov
http://coral.aoml.noaa.gov/mailman/listinfo/coral-list

New York Times DotEarth: Politics: Politics-Minded Marine Group Targets ‘Ocean Enemy #1’

http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/09/01/politics-minded-marine-group-targets-ocean-enemy-1/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=1&
By ANDREW C. REVKIN SEPTEMBER 1, 2014 11:56 AM
September 1, 2014 11:56 am
 
This story is included with an NYT Opinion subscription.
 
Randy Olson, who shifted long ago from an academic career in marine biology to a focus on filmmaking, science communication and effective storytelling, offered this “Your Dot” contribution on Ocean Champions. This group has the simple – if daunting – goal of electing or re-electing lawmakers who fight for the oceans. Congressional politics is a rough-and-tumble arena and the group, as Olson describes in the context of a Florida race, is not afraid to play hard. Here’s his piece:

Ocean Champions:  Leading the Attack on Congressman Steve Southerland, “Ocean Enemy #1”
 
Long before Bill Maher introduced his “Flip a District” concept on his HBO show, the folks at Ocean Champions perfected the idea. Supporters of the group choose an “Ocean Enemy #1” – the member of Congress who does the most to harm the oceans – then the organization goes after the politician who receives the dubious title.

The organization, led by the marine biologist David Wilmot, is different than many other conservation groups in that it is a 501(c)(4) organization with a connected political action committee called Ocean Champions PAC. It does three main things – get good people elected, help develop sound ocean policy, and, what I think is the most fun (but that’s just me), they go after “Ocean Enemies.”

In 2006 they put the label on California congressman Richard Pombo and not only helped get him defeated, but kept him in their crosshairs – helping make sure he lost again in 2010 when he attempted another run.

Now Ocean Champions has identified Representative Steve Southerland of Florida as its current “Ocean Enemy #1.”  The latest poll commissioned by Ocean Champions shows the challenger, Gwen Graham, has taken a slight lead.  Ocean Champions made a nice TV commercial featuring a local fisherman speaking out against Southerland:

By November Southerland may be joining Pombo in Davy Jones’s locker.
The chair of the Ocean Champions board is my friend Samantha Campbell. I asked her a simple question – is it working?


She replied, “Absolutely. Just look at our record of accomplishments – we’ve backed 52 members who are now serving in the 113th Congress, we recently orchestrated a bipartisan effort to defeat legislative action that would have killed funding for a sustainable fishery program, and played a major role this summer in the passage of the first piece of freestanding ocean legislation this Congress – a bill to combat harmful algal blooms, hypoxia and dead zones.”

So let me offer a view that will probably offend some conservation folks. I sometimes look at paralysis on marine conservation issues and think, “Why doesn’t someone just go to D.C. and fix this?” Ocean Champions is one group I’ve seen over the past few decades that has really taken this sort of real-world philosophy and put it into action for the oceans.
 
I’m a big fan, and encourage you to support them so you can help sink the ship of Southerland on election night.

David Wilmot, a marine biologist, is the president of the organization Ocean Champions.
Credit
Ocean Champions

E&E: Kerry’s ‘Our Ocean’ conference spurs domestic and global commitments to sea conservation

Elspeth Dehnert, E&E reporter

Published: Wednesday, June 18, 2014

The State Department’s “Our Ocean” conference, hosted by Secretary of
State John Kerry, concluded yesterday with well over $1 billion in
pledges to protect and preserve the world’s oceans.

For two consecutive days, heads of state, foreign ministers,
policymakers, scientists, environmentalists and experts from nearly 90
countries, gathered at the department’s Washington, D.C., headquarters
with the goal of developing strategies to combat marine pollution,
overfishing and ocean acidification.

President Obama led the charge early in the day when he announced
plans to make a vast portion of the south-central Pacific Ocean off
limits to energy exploration, fishing and other harmful activities,
thereby creating one of the largest ocean preserves in the world.

The administration will attempt to expand the Pacific Remote Islands
Marine National Monument with the guidance of scientists, fishermen,
conservation experts and elected officials.

“If we drain our oceans of resources, we won’t just be squandering one
of humanity’s greatest treasures, we’ll be cutting off one of the
world’s major sources of food and economic growth,” Obama said in a
video message. “And we can’t afford to let that happen.”

The president also said he will be directing federal agencies to
develop a comprehensive program to combat black-market fishing by
addressing seafood fraud and preventing illegally caught fish from
entering the marketplace.

Other domestic efforts include $102 million in Department of Interior
grants to restore natural barriers and floodplains, such as the
wetlands and marshes that run along the Atlantic Coast, and the
release of a white paper on ocean acidification by the White House
Office of Science and Technology Policy.

“Now that’s just some of what we’re planning to do here in the United
States,” Kerry said. “But as President Obama made clear this morning,
we’re really just getting started.”

A global effort

The island country of Palau will be following in the United States’
footsteps with the creation of the Palau National Marine Sanctuary,
which will protect up to 500,000 square kilometers, or 80 percent, of
the country’s Exclusive Economic Zone by banning industrial-scale
fishing in the area.

“Palau comes to the table with a call for more marine protected
areas,” said the country’s president, Tommy Remengesau Jr. “It’s not a
one-size-fits-all formula but a call for all of us to put a share of
the solution on the table.”

Norway, meanwhile, made one of the biggest strides with a pledge to
allocate more than $1 billion for climate change mitigation and
assistance, including a substantial contribution to the Green Climate
Fund. The Scandinavian country also said it will spend more than $150
million to promote sustainable fisheries and put $1 million toward a
study looking at ways to combat marine plastic waste and
“microplastics.”

“We need clean and protected oceans to safeguard our existence,” said
Norway Foreign Minister Børge Brende. “The better we take care of the
ocean, the better the ocean can help us take care of our needs.”

Hollywood was also present at the event in the form of award-winning
actor Leonardo DiCaprio, who gave opening remarks alongside Kerry and
pledged $7 million to ocean conservation projects. “I’ve learned about
the incredibly important role our oceans play on the survival of all
life on Earth,” he said, “and I’ve decided to join so many people and
others that are working here today to protect this vital treasure.”

Souring seas in the spotlight

Conference speaker Carol Turley, of the Plymouth Marine Laboratory in
the United Kingdom, rang the alarm bells on the rapid pace of global

ocean acidification, saying “it is happening at a speed we haven’t
seen for millions of years.”

“If we keep doing what we’re doing,” she added, “we’re going to end up
with a world that is between 3 and 6 degrees warmer and end up with
seas that are between 100 and 150 times more acidic.”

NOAA Administrator Kathryn Sullivan later announced that the federal
agency will contribute more than $9 million over the next three years
to the Global Ocean Acidification Observing Network. It is a financial
boost that Kerry said will enable the international effort to “better
monitor ocean acidification around the world.”

“And so out of this conference has come more — a commitment to a
combination of effort with respect to climate and oceans, but
specifically focused on acidification and sea level rise,” said the
secretary of State.

“We will convene again,” he concluded. “It will be in Peru, and after

that maybe back here. We will convene again.”
_________
 
Senators vow to do more to address pollution, maintenance concerns

Jessica Estepa, E&E reporter

Published: Wednesday, June 18, 2014

At the State Department’s Our Ocean Conference, Sen. Sheldon
Whitehouse (D-R.I.), who co-chairs the Senate Oceans Caucus, yesterday
called for a greater focus on monitoring and tracking marine debris.

As the Obama administration advances ocean conservation, senators
passionate about the seas will likely take on some of those same
issues in Congress.

In an interview, caucus co-Chairwoman Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) later
said that the caucus has discussed “doing more.”

“Our reality is we might have these systems out there, if you don’t
maintain them, it’s tough to get the data you need,” the Alaska
Republican said.

The group also may take up ocean acidification, Murkowski said,
another of the oceans issues brought up at the conference. The problem
has long been acknowledged among the senators — it was discussed at
the caucus’s first meeting in 2011 — and at least one member of the
caucus, Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), has repeatedly called attention
to the issue at hearings and on the Senate floor.

Murkowski noted that the caucus has done its part to advance another
issue on the administration’s agenda: dealing with illegal, unreported
and unregulated fishing. Earlier this year, the caucus served as the
force behind the Senate’s approval of four fishing treaties that have
long awaited ratification, including the Port State Measures
Agreement.

She said she was “encouraged” by President Obama’s announcement of a
national strategy to combat illegal fishing, noting that the issue has
gained some traction.

“I appreciate the fact that the president is looking at this as an
issue that is important not only from the conservation perspective but
also from the perspective of support for a major economic sector,” she
said. “We’ll see where the task force goes and the kind of direction

he gives it.”
Special thanks to Richard Charter