NPR: U.S. Watches Closely As Oil Drilling Begins Off Cuba

http://www.npr.org/2012/02/13/146635957/u-s-watches-closely-as-oil-drilling-begins-off-cuba

by GREG ALLEN

Listen to the Story
All Things Considered
[4 min 35 sec]

*February 13, 2012

There are big plans for oil exploration in the Caribbean, not far off the coast of Florida. A Spanish company recently began drilling in Cuban waters – just 55 miles from Key West.
The well is the first of several exploratory wells planned in Cuba and the Bahamas. The drilling has officials and researchers in Florida scrambling to make plans for how they’ll respond in case of a spill.

The U.S. currently doesn’t allow any drilling for oil off its Atlantic coast or in the eastern Gulf of Mexico. One reason is what’s at stake. Florida’s tourism-based economy depends on its beaches, fishing and clear Caribbean water.

Environmental Concerns

The U.S. ban on drilling off of Florida, however, doesn’t affect America’s Caribbean neighbors. The exploratory well being drilled off of Cuba has many here concerned, including people like Richard Dodge. Dodge is the dean of Nova Southeastern University’s Oceanographic Center in Dania Beach, near Fort Lauderdale, and what he’s really concerned about is coral.

At the school, Dodge and his graduate students raise staghorn coral in outdoor saltwater tanks. Live coral grow in the crystal-clear water, some just finger length.

“These are relatively new ones that we’re starting out,” Dodge says. “But over here, these are ones we’ll be transplanting to the wild.”

In another tank, large branches of coral will soon be used to help restore damaged reefs.
Florida is home to more than three-quarters of the nation’s coral reefs – and they haven’t been doing so well. Development and warming oceans have already weakened many.

On a map, Dodge points out the location of what he believes is an even bigger potential threat – the spot where Cuba has approved offshore oil drilling. “The site that will be drilled,” he says, “is only about 50 miles from Key West.”

The rig drilling off Cuba’s northern coast is operating in water that is more than a mile deep. But it’s not the depth that concerns Dodge. In the case of a blowout, it’s the operation’s proximity to the Gulf Stream.

“We’re worried that it could get into that stream fast and therefore, within days, impact our coastal ecosystem and coastline,” Dodge says. A spill could potentially affect hundreds of miles of beaches, mangroves and estuaries from the Keys to Palm Beach.

At the organization Clean Caribbean and Americas, 30,000 feet of floating boom is ready for immediate shipping in the case of an oil spill.

Dodge and other marine scientists in Florida are asking the federal government to fund research that would help identify the resources most at risk, and develop guidelines to protect them.

Embargo Could Complicate Cleanup

Complicating matters is the fact that this new well is being drilled in the waters of a country that’s under a strict U.S. embargo. Unless they apply for and receive special permission from the government, U.S. companies are banned from doing any work on the well – even if there’s a spill.

Jorge Pinon, a former oil company executive and now a research fellow at the University of Texas, says if there’s a blowout, the U.S. president is sure to immediately lift the embargo for companies that respond.

Pinon also says the Spanish company doing the drilling, Repsol, has a lot of experience with deep-water drilling in the Gulf. And, he says, the company has upgraded its procedures to incorporate lessons learned in the 2010 Deepwater Horizon spill.

But Pinon sees another problem. Because of the 50-year-old embargo, the U.S. and Cuban governments have almost no contact. “There is no agreement of cooperation of who’s going to do what during an incident like this,” he says.

After the Deepwater Horizon blowout, Pinon notes Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen was put in charge of the cleanup – coordinating industry and government efforts.

“That’s not going to be the case here,” Pinon says. “And here particularly, it’s between two countries that have not spoken to each other in 50 years.”

Cooperation Progressing – So Far

But there are people working on developing contingency plans.

At the Clean Caribbean and Americas cooperative in Fort Lauderdale, a warehouse is full of oil skimmers, floating boom and tanks of chemical dispersant. The organization is funded by oil companies with one mission: to respond to big oil spills. Company personnel are now working with Cuban officials on the international response to a spill in Cuban waters.

Clean Caribbean and Americas technical adviser Mike Gass says that in a meeting recently in Havana, Cuban authorities agreed to cooperate on customs, immigration and air space control. And Cuba has already approved some cleanup procedures, such as burning large patches of oil.

Gass says Cuba has also agreed, if there’s a spill, to use chemical dispersant. “They have their own agriculture spray aircraft that would be their first line of defense to apply these things,” he says.

Gass says Cuban officials are offering good cooperation so far. “People are talking,” he says, “people are listening, people are motivated.”

There is a chance that after drilling, energy companies may not find enough oil off of Cuba to merit further exploration. Pinon, the former oil company executive, says the rig off of Cuba is scheduled to drill three wells – at a cost of $100 million each.

The fact that international oil companies are investing $300 million shows the industry’s confidence that its next big oil field may be just 50 miles off the coast of Florida.

Special thanks to Richard Charter

Yourhoustonnews.com: How will Gulf of Mexico recover from Horizon spill?

http://www.yourhoustonnews.com/courier/

Posted: Monday, February 13, 2012 4:00 am

The crowd was modest, but the topic was vital. After the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, what should be done to restore what the public lost in environmental damage to the Gulf of Mexico?

The Department of the Interior, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and several state agencies were at Texas A&M University at Galveston recently to hear public comments on the Phase I Early Restoration Plan and Environmental Assessment.

All the initial projects are in the other four coastal states, which felt the immediate effects of the spill. Texas will be in line for funding for some of the projects later.
Texans ought to be slow, however, in trying to get pet projects funded. There are bigger issues here.

Scientists are still trying to assess the damage — not just to specific beaches and marshes and wildlife in specific areas, but to the overall Gulf.

It would be good if all five Gulf Coast states could put aside state boundaries for a bit and think of the Gulf of Mexico as a single, common resource. It would be good, in other words, if we stopped thinking about how to get new boat ramps with this pot of money and started thinking about such basic things as water quality in the Gulf.

Perhaps the best suggestion at the meeting in Galveston, given the uncertainty of the damage and the uncertainty of what it would take to address it, came from the Ocean Conservancy: Set high standards for scientific monitoring the damage and restoration efforts. Fund those monitoring efforts adequately.

That is an excellent place to start.

— The Daily News of Galveston County

Special thanks to Richard Charter

Gulf Restoration Network: 85% of People at Public Meeting in Mississippi oppose offshore oil drilling

http://www.wlox.com/category/194069/video-center?autoStart=true&topVideoCatNo=default&clipId=6732667#.TzZqiKHT8OU.facebook

Gulf Restoration Network: United for a healthy Gulf of Mexico
Great work by our coalition fighting drilling in Mississippi! The state did admit that most folks don’t want drilling – they wouldn’t share how much they’ve spent on their slick PR campaign to convince coastal communities drilling is a great idea.
WLOX-TV: 85% of People at Public Meetings Oppose Drilling off MS Coast
www.wlox.com

WLOX TV 13 – This week, the Mississippi Development Authority released the results of several public meetings held on their proposal. Thanks to the work of the 12 Miles South Coalition, it was revealed that the vast majority of those who commented on the fast-tracked proposal are opposed.

Truthout.org: What the Koch Brothers Say Online but Won’t Say Under Oath about Keystone XL Pipeline

http://www.truth-out.org/what-koch-brothers-say-online-wont-say-under-oath/1328906640
Friday 10 February 2012
by: Robert Greenwald, Brave New Foundation | Op-Ed

David Koch. (Photo: Stephen Crowley / The New York Times)

Why will Charles and David Koch produce a video about their position on the Keystone XL oil pipeline and not testify before Congress about it? The Koch brothers have refused to answer questions about how they stand to profit from the Keystone XL pipeline, a 1,700-mile long boondoggle that would cut through six states and damage American homes and farmland.

The Koch brothers have an attack-dog website of their own, KochFacts.com, which they have used defensively and reflexively to attack me and others who’ve questioned or investigated the Koch brothers’ vast $100 billion business. The Koch brothers refuse to testify in Congress about their interest in the pipeline, but they’ll make a web video asserting their innocence.

We took the Kochs’ video retreat and added a few facts from the historical record.

Maybe the Koch brothers prefer to let their allies in Congress speak for them? House Energy and Commerce Committee chair Rep. Ed Whitfield got $15,000 in donations from Koch Industries. Is he doing the Koch brothers bidding?

Whitfield is the tip of the iceberg. The Koch brothers and their employees were the single largest oil and gas donors to the committee with jurisdiction over the Keystone XL pipeline. They’ve contributed $279,500 to 22 of the 31 Republicans and $32,000 to five Democrats on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, according to the Los Angeles Times. It makes sense then that Whitfield and his cohorts would shy away from biting the hand that feeds them.

But the Koch brothers admit their business interests in Keystone. A Koch company website confesses to being among the “largest crude oil purchasers, shippers and exporters” at the pipeline’s starting point in Northwest Canada.

What’s stopping the Koch brothers from testifying under oath in Congress? Apparently the Koch brothers are OK publishing statements on KochFacts.com that they won’t repeat in Congress. Why won’t they testify before Congress and put the issue to rest?

Activism around the Keystone pipeline has put the Koch brothers on the defensive. We need to continue insisting the Koch brothers testify in Congress. If they’ll make a video about the Keystone XL pipeline, why can’t they testify about their interest in it?

Nola.com/Times-Picayune: National Park Service, Mississippi casinos question offshore drilling

http://www.nola.com/business/index.ssf/2012/02/national_park_service_mississi.html

Published: Friday, February 10, 2012, 7:30 PM
By The Associated Press

The National Park Service says it opposes offshore drilling rules proposed by the Mississippi Development Authority. The federal agency said allowing drilling within one mile of Horn and Petit Bois islands would spoil the islands’ congressionally designated wilderness character.

Meanwhile, casino operators say they’re not opposed to drilling but don’t want tourist areas overrun by industrial equipment, boats and workers. The drilling is mainly expected to produce natural gas.

The letters were among those MDA received during a 43-day comment period and in public hearings on its draft of offshore leasing and seismic surveying rules. Environmental groups were critical of MDA for not extending the comment period.

Daniel Brown, superintendent of Gulf Islands National Seashore, wrote a Jan. 31 letter to MDA saying the state should not allow industrial structures that would spoil the scenic and wild character of the islands. He wrote that the park service “opposes final development and subsequent issuance of the proposed rules for offshore seismic surveying and minerals leasing within Mississippi state waters, as those proposed rules are written.”

A group that opposes drilling in state waters sent Brown’s letter Friday to The Associated Press and other news organizations.

Brown said the park service needed more time to evaluate how the rules would affect the seashore, which includes all or part of five barrier islands in the Mississippi Sound. He noted 10 problems, among them the possibility for degraded scenery at the seashore, as well as light, water and air pollution that could harm birds, turtles and dolphins

“Due to their untrammeled and pristine character, the barrier islands attract approximately 1.1 million visitors per year,” Brown wrote, saying the park service has a duty to preserve the islands forever. “One of the primary attractions is the opportunity to enjoy unencumbered scenic view sheds of the Gulf of Mexico, the night sky and other recreational attributes that are inherent to a natural setting that is unaffected by artificial sights and noise.”

The Sun Herald reports the casino letter was sent to the MDA by lawyers for Beau Rivage, Island View and IP casinos. The Beau Rivage and IP are in Biloxi and the Island View is in Gulfport.

In the letter, the casino operators want to know where ports to support exploration and drilling would be located and what routes would be used to move equipment to and from drilling and exploration sites.

The casino operators recommended MDA include in its leasing- and seismic-testing rules language from a 2004 offshore oil and gas law that prohibits activity in most of the near-shore waters of the Mississippi Sound.

Many environmentalists and some coastal business leaders still oppose any offshore exploration or drilling and have said even after most of the Sound was put off limits, the barrier islands and other areas could still be harmed.

Casino and some other business leaders reigned in their protest when the 2004 law was written to secure protection for most near-shore water. Only two areas, on the Alabama and Louisiana lines, would allow exploration and drilling nearshore.

Opponents have said the Legislature could easily come back later and open water inside the Sound to drilling, and the Alabama-line area is near fragile habitat.

MDA officials told the newspaper that they will consider the casinos’ concerns and meet with tourism leaders. They said they were uncertain where landside operations will be based or exactly who might regulate their operations, but they don’t believe drilling will harm tourism or the environment.

“From MDA’s standpoint, tourism is vital,” said MDA spokesman Dan Turner. “Between (oil and gas) and tourism, tourism is a bigger deal — at least it is now. It’s here. It’s happening now and we want it to continue to grow.”

Jack Moody, MDA’s program director for mineral leasing, said, “We don’t want to turn a tourist area into an industrial one.”

He said the Mississippi Coast already has three industrial ports, and likely any oil and gas operations would be based in those.

But, he said, “we want to maintain flexibility” with rules, because some area boaters and fishermen might want to work with oil and gas.

“We want to allow Mississippians to get those jobs,” Moody said.

Cathy Beeding, attorney for Island View, said casinos just want to see “a balanced approach” to exploration and drilling that protects tourism.

“We certainly understand the state’s interest in economic development, and we don’t want to stymie that,” Beeding said. “As they move to the next steps, we want to make sure they balance those concerns.”

The Mississippi Sierra Club and the Gulf Restoration Network sent out a news release Friday that said the process was not transparent and had resulted in mistakes.

Louie Miller, state director of the Mississippi Sierra Club, said in the news release that the process was an “outrage and insulting” to the public and officials “who have voiced concerns about a rush to judgment on these rules before the public has had an opportunity to properly review them.”

MDA has estimated there is around 350 billion cubic feet of natural gas offshore and that the state could receive $250 million to $500 million over however many years it takes to pump it out.

Local governments would also receive severance payments.

Special thanks to Richard Charter

"Be the change you want to see in the world." Mahatma Gandhi