Global Spin: Cuba Set to Begin Offshore Drilling: Is Florida In Eco-Straits?

http://globalspin.blogs.time.com/2011/09/23/cuba-set-to-begin-offshore-drilling-is-florida-in-eco-straits/

Time

Posted by TIM PADGETT
Friday, September 23, 2011 at 3:58 pm

The Cuban and Chinese national flags fly next to each other at an oil rig of the Great Wall Drilling Company, a subsidiary of China National Petroleum Corp (CNPC), near Varadero, around 140 kilometres (86 miles) east of Havana, September 4, 2011. (Desmond Boylan-Reuters)

Like the tourism-dependent state of Florida, the tourism-dependent nation of Cuba 90 miles away can’t afford to foul its picturesque coastline with an oil spill. But unlike Florida, which has long resisted the temptation of lucrative offshore drilling, Cuba is broke. And because it’s now hearing the seductive call of as much as 20 billion barrels of crude sitting beneath the ocean just miles from Havana, the communist island is poised to begin drilling in those waters before the end of the year.

According to a map of the 43,000-sq-mile (112,00-sq-km) drilling area, some of that activity could take place as close as 45 miles from the Florida Keys and the precious coral reefs and marine sanctuaries that line them. Understandably, that’s got folks in Florida, who to say the least aren’t politically chummy with the Castro regime, environmentally fretful now as well. Which is why a delegation of U.S. and international environmentalists and drilling experts visited Cuba this month to discuss safeguards against a BP-style spill choking the Florida Straits. Fortunately, says Dan Whittle, a senior attorney for the New York-based Environmental Defense Fund, “the Cubans seem very motivated to do [the drilling] right. They understand an accident would only set back their plans and put their foreign partners under pressure to hold off investing.”

Still, Whittle notes, one has to contrast Cuba’s good intentions with its threadbare technology, infrastructure and means – including the lack of a bona fide oil spill clean-up fund. (The U.S. maintains a $1 billion clean-up reserve.) Cuba, which produces about 50,000 barrels of oil per day inland, is having to rely on foreign petro-firms to do the costlier and more complicated maritime extraction. Companies like Spain’s Repsol – which is currently sending a massive ocean rig from Singapore to the Florida Straits and is slated to begin drilling after the hurricane season ends Dec. 1 – have the burden of bringing their own equipment and know-how to fill the Cuban void. And because of Washington’s 49-year-old trade embargo against Cuba, they can’t acquire spare parts next door in the U.S.

The question, then, is whether Washington will at least grant those firms access to U.S. spill prevention and clean-up hardware and services. The Obama Administration has said it will let U.S. companies do business with Cuba’s foreign partners in that context on a case-by-case basis. U.S. Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen of Miami, an ardent embargo supporter who represents the Keys and chairs the House Foreign Affairs Committee, tells TIME that “should a disaster occur and Florida’s waters be threatened, U.S. regulations could allow U.S. oil spill mitigation companies to engage in clean-up activities.”

But Whittle and other delegation members like William Reilly, a former Environmental Protection Agency administrator and co-chairman of the White House task force that investigated last year’s disastrous BP spill in the Gulf of Mexico, are urging that the doors to cooperation be as open as possible, not just in response to spills but beforehand – when, for example, a foreign firm drilling off Cuba is in a hurry to replace something like a blowout preventer, the equipment whose failure led to the BP spill. “We feel it’s a no-brainer for the U.S.,” says Whittle. “It doesn’t really strengthen Cuba’s hand” in terms of actual oil drilling, “but it does strengthen everyone’s hand in terms of being prepared for emergencies.”

The estimates of Cuba’s offshore oil reserves range from 5 billion barrels to 20 billion (the latter being the Cuban government’s calculation). But it’s uncertain if Havana will be able to interest firms in exploring all 59 maritime fields it has designated off its north coast. Repsol, Statoil of Norway and ONGC of India will get the drills diving in six fields near Havana, while five other firms, including Petrobras of Brazil, have signed up for about 20 others. (China’s state-run CNPC is still negotiating concessions in five.) And even if a spill were to occur, the local currents would likely carry any slick east before it could reach the Keys – although Whittle warns “there is a lot of unpredictability in that area so the Keys have ample reason to be concerned.” Florida’s Atlantic coast could be vulnerable as well. But the more certain eco-damage, environmentalists note, would be to the beach resorts and coral reefs off Cuba’s north coast.

That fact – and the just as salient reality that Cuba’s $2 billion-a-year tourism industry is one of its its main economic engines – should give Cuba every reason to be extra vigilant about accidents. Florida leaders like Ros-Lehtinen and U.S. Senator Bill Nelson insist the best way to avoid them is get Cuba to scrap its offshore drilling plans altogether. But that’s unrealistic. For one, thanks to a combination of mismanagement and the embargo, Cuba’s economy is already so dilapidated that President Raúl Castro is having to lay off a million state workers, and he desperately needs the oil windfall. And while leftist Venezuelan President and staunch ally Hugo Chávez sends some 120,000 barrels of oil each day to Cuba on very favorable financing terms, questions surrounding Chávez’s health (he was diagnosed this past summer with cancer) and his re-election prospects next year have made the Cubans all the more determined to be more energy self-sufficient.

As a result, this is one offshore drilling venture Florida can’t control. What it can help ensure, however, is that it’s a safe one.

Special thanks to Richard Charter.

Nola.com: Gulf oil spill investigators silenced, U.S. House panel chairman says

http://www.nola.com/news/gulf-oil-spill/index.ssf/2011/09/gulf_oil_spill_investigators_s_1.html

Looks like Chevron bought out the Interior chair. There should be a prohibition that anyone leaving government work on a specific industry–such as oil–is banned from going to work for them for a period of years.
DV

Times-Picayune

Published: Thursday, September 22, 2011, 9:17 PM Updated: Thursday, September 22, 2011, 9:39 PM
By David Hammer, The Times-Picayune

A U.S. House committee was forced to postpone a hearing on the findings of a federal investigation into the causes of the BP oil spill because the Obama administration suddenly refused to let investigators testify, the committee chairman said.

The alleged silencing of the members of the joint Coast Guard and Interior Department investigative team comes in the wake of the sudden resignation of Interior’s lead investigator, Hammond resident David Dykes.

In a news release late Thursday afternoon, Rep. Doc Hastings, R-Wash., the chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee, blasted the Obama administration.

“It took far too long for the final report to be issued and the Obama administration is now further delaying proper oversight by suddenly refusing to allow members of the investigation team to testify,” Hastings said in a statement.

Interior’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement and the Coast Guard said they never wanted “line investigators” to testify. They are seeking to clarify that with Hastings at a meeting Friday, apparently to offer more senior agency officials to testify.

“BOEMRE and the Coast Guard were responsive to Chairman Hastings and his Committee’s request late last week for a hearing. However, we felt strongly from the beginning it was inappropriate for BOEMRE and Coast Guard line investigators to testify, and presented alternative options,” a joint statement from the two agencies said.

Before the final investigative report bearing his name was released, Dykes resigned after 12 years at BOEMRE and its predecessor agency, the Minerals Management Service. He went to work for Chevron Corp.

His investigative team oversaw the most comprehensive probe into what happened April 20 on the Deepwater Horizon rig, which exploded and sank, killing 11 men and sending nearly 5 million barrels of crude into the Gulf.

Tensions between Dykes’ team and officials at the federal agency’s Washington headquarters were on the rise during a long delay in the release of the report, according to a Sept. 13 story in the Washington Post. The investigative report missed two deadlines, raising speculation about battles over the report’s wording.

President Barack Obama’s Oil Spill Commission came up with significantly different findings about the cause of the spill than the Coast Guard-Interior report that was finally released last week. The presidential commission, with no subpoena power, determined the root causes of the spill were systemic and industry-wide, something that some experts disagreed with. By contrast, the Coast Guard-Interior report, the official accident investigation based on months of sworn testimony and subpoenaed records, placed the blame for key causes of the explosion squarely at BP’s feet.

The Oil Spill Commission’s findings in January helped justify the administration’s deepwater drilling moratorium and cautious approach to resuming drilling activity under new permitting standards. The industry has long argued that a slowdown in drilling can’t be justified if the causes of the Deepwater Horizon incident are specific to BP’s management decisions.

Hastings said he notified the Interior Department and the Coast Guard that he “expects” the two chairmen of the investigative team, Dykes and Coast Guard Capt. Hung Nguyen, to be available to testify at a rescheduled hearing Oct. 6.
Dykes and a spokesman from Chevron did not comment late Thursday.

*******
David Hammer can be reached at dhammer@timespicayune.com or 504.826.3322.

Special thanks to Richard Charter

Investors Business Daily Editorial: Drill, Cuba, Drill

http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/585768/201109221832/Drill-Cuba-Drill.htm

This pretty much sums up Big Oil’s perspective. DV

Posted 06:32 PM ET
While rich domestic sources of oil remain off-limits to American producers, a foreign consortium will use this Chinese-built rig to drill for crude..

Energy Policy: Deep-water drilling will resume in the Florida Strait when a giant, semi-submersible oil rig en route from Singapore arrives later this fall. The bad news is it will not be American.

While U.S. oil and energy prices “necessarily skyrocket,” as President Obama once said they would under energy policies that have imposed a de facto ban on offshore drilling, a massive Chinese-built semi-submersible oil rig is on its way from Singapore to a drilling position off northwest Cuba perhaps as little as 50 miles from Key West, Fla.

The long-predicted move could come as early as November, as Spanish oil giant Repsol YPF leads an international consortium that will operate the rig known as Scarabeo 9. It wants to wait until the hurricane season ends before it begins drilling.

Six wells are planned to be drilled with this rig by the various international companies that own exploration rights off the north shore of the island.

Repsol drilled the only offshore well in Cuba in 2004 and said at the time it had found hydrocarbons. It plans to drill at depths of more than 5,500 feet, deeper than the blown-out Deepwater Horizon well that spewed 5 million barrels of crude into the Gulf of Mexico two summers ago.

Normally, what are called “economic zones” extend 200 miles off a country’s coastline. In some cases, there are conflicts based on resources and geography. In 1977, President Carter signed a treaty with communist Cuba that essentially split the difference and created for Cuba an “exclusive economic zone” extending from the western tip of Cuba northward virtually to Key West. Cuba then divided its side of the Florida Strait into 59 parcels and put them up for lease.

The U.S. Geological Survey recently estimated the North Cuban Basin contains as much as 9 billion barrels of oil and 22 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. Other estimates range from 5 billion to 20 billion barrels of crude. Pools of oil and natural gas tend not to obey lines drawn on a map. It’s certain that at least some of Cuba’s wells will be tapping oil pools that straddle the boundary separating our zone from Cuba’s, meaning Havana will be getting oil that should be ours.

Meanwhile, the administration persists in pouring money into bankrupt solar-panel manufacturers as it imposes a seven-year drilling moratorium in the Eastern Gulf of Mexico and off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts. The Arctic National Wildlife refuge is off-limits, as are the nearby Beaufort Sea and most of the Chukchi Sea. What Gulf drilling remains is slowed by a snails-pace permitting process.

Robert Bluey of the Heritage Foundation says that allowing access to oil and natural gas resources now off-limits would increase U.S. crude oil production by as much as 2 million barrels per day by 2030, offsetting more than one-fifth of our oil imports.

According to the American Petroleum Institute, federal lands also hold an estimated 116.4 billion barrels of recoverable oil, enough to produce gasoline for 65 million cars and fuel oil for 3.2 million households for 60 years.

The argument against Gulf drilling has been the potential for oil leaks and spoiled beaches. Where are the environmentalists to protest this deal? Fact is, more oil bubbles up naturally from the sea floor than has ever leaked from oil platforms in the Gulf. They are in fact prime spots for tourist fishing since they act as artificial reefs for sea life.

The oil and gas resources of the Gulf of Mexico and the Outer Continental Shelf could be fueling American cars and heating American homes, not those in Beijing, Madrid or Havana. If Cuba and others can drill off the coast of Florida, why can’t we?

Special thanks to Richard Charter

US Coast Guard: UPDATE 3: Coast Guard responds to reports of crude oil in Bayou Dupont

I guess I never realized that old abandoned oil wells still have the potential to leak and create oil spills……..it’s an environmental threat that never goes away. DV

News Release
Date: September 19, 2011
Contact: D8 Staff
(504) 671-2020

NEW ORLEANS — The Coast Guard continues the response to a report of a crude oil discharge in Bayou Dupont and north Barataria Bay, Sunday.

The Coast Guard has determined that approximately 2,016 gallons of oil have been recovered from the site of the oil discharge in Bayou Dupont, near Wilkinson Canal in Jefferson Parish.

Response crews have secured the source of the first reported discharge and the second leak has ceased discharging. A third leak was discovered, Wednesday, near the southwest corner of the site and is no longer actively discharging. Containment boom has been placed around the leak by response crews.

Coast Guard Sector New Orleans is coordinating response efforts with the Louisiana Oil Spill Coordinator’s Office, Louisiana State Police, Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries and Louisiana Department of Natural Resources and Jefferson Parish Department of Environmental Affairs.

Watchstanders at Coast Guard Sector New Orleans received a report at 2:05 p.m., Sept. 11, from a Plaquemine’s Parish operator, that a pipeline from a platform was leaking crude oil into Bayou Dupont.

The platform and associated wellheads are classified as orphaned by LDNR with the last owner of record listed as Cedyco Corp. Under authority provided by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, the Coast Guard issued an administrative order to Cedyco to secure the source of the discharge and to conduct clean-up operations. The Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund has been opened to provide monetary support for any federal clean-up organizations. The Coast Guard contracted Oil Mop, an oil spill removal organization, for clean-up operations.

Approximately 13,080 feet of boom have been deployed to contain the oil and seven oil response boats, two skimmers and 59 personnel are on scene participating in the clean up.
LDWF is on scene to assess any impacts to wildlife. There are currently no reports of impacts to wildlife.

Other than the safety zone that was issued, there is no impact on fishing or recreational boating. All mariners are advised to avoid crossing boom or interfering with the response area and to avoid transiting through or fishing in any oiled areas. If oil sheen is spotted, it is requested that mariners report it to the National Response Center at 1-800-424-8802.

The LADEQ does not expect there to be any effect on seafood.

Coast Guard investigators have concluded that the sheens, oiled pelicans and tarballs reported this week in other parts of Barataria Bay are not related to this spill. The Coast Guard is investigating the cause of the incident.

###
Saving Lives and Guarding the Coast Since 1790.
The United States Coast Guard — Proud History. Powerful Future.

Special thanks to Richard Charter

Northwest Florida Daily news: What does Scott really think about drilling oil in the Everglades?

http://www2.highlandstoday.com/content/2011/sep/17/LAOPINO1-what-does-scott-really-think-about-drilli/

Highlands Today

Saturday, September 17, 2011
Published: September 17, 2011

The Northwest Florida Daily News, Fort Walton Beach, on drilling in the Everglades:
Gov. Rick Scott has some oily swampland he’d like to sell us. After presidential candidate Michele Bachmann suggested drilling in the Florida Everglades, fellow Republican Scott chimed in, saying the tiny amount of oil production that goes on in the Glades may not be enough.

He told The Economic Club of Florida he could support a “cautious” amount of new drilling. The Associated Press quoted him: “It’s my understanding, at least, (that) we haven’t had any problems in the Everglades to date.”

Funny, that’s pretty much what supporters of drilling in the Gulf of Mexico said until April 20, 2010, when the Deepwater Horizon rig exploded, burned, sank and unleashed a massive oil spill that stained beaches, killed wildlife and crippled the fishing and tourism industries in our region for a long, nightmarish season.

It was just like Scott’s sunny assessment of drilling in the Everglades. We hadn’t had any problems in the Gulf. Until we did.

And the problems may linger. After Tropical Storm Lee churned up the Gulf, tar balls began washing up on beaches near Gulf Shores, Ala.

Nobody knew whether the tar balls were left over from last year’s Deepwater Horizon spill. But, significantly, workers hired by BP – the oil company blamed for the spill – quickly began picking up the gooey stuff.

“It’s more proof,” said Gulf Shores city spokesman Grant Brown, “that there still are offshore tar mats (on the Gulf floor) and it’s washing ashore.”

Drilling proponents no doubt will argue that the Everglades won’t see any “deep water” drilling. Last year’s blown well off Louisiana was almost a mile down. But remember: In 1979, another Gulf oil leak took 10 months to plug, and it was in a mere 150 feet of water. Oops. Almost forgot. Rep. Bachmann didn’t talk only about drilling in the Everglades. She thought it would be nifty to see more drilling in the eastern Gulf of Mexico, too. Terrific.

So here’s our advice to Floridians who cherish the Everglades, that carpet of green, brown and blue in the southern part of our state: If Scott and Bachmann have their way, you’d better start planning how to clean up after the disaster that’s bound to happen. And find some good lawyers.

Special thanks to Richard Charter

"Be the change you want to see in the world." Mahatma Gandhi