RealVail.com: As Obama calls for end to oil company tax breaks, new report links surging profits to lobbying efforts

http://www.realvail.com/article/624/As-Obama-calls-for-end-to-oil-company-tax-breaks-new-report-links-surging-profits-to-lobbying-efforts

Obama is right; we need to cut oil subsidies and fund solar and other renewal energy sources. DV

By David O. Williams
Real Vail – May 3, 2011

With Congress and the White House increasingly railing against record oil company profits, a study latelast week linked those windfalls to millions spent on lobbying and direct campaign contributions.

The nonprofit Checks and Balances Project last week released an analysis of the skyrocketing profits of the nation’s top five oil and gas companies in the wake of near-record gas prices and compared those profits to lobbying expenditures and political contributions in 2010.

ExxonMobil reported first quarter 2011 profits of $10.7 billion compared to $6.3 billion in 2010, a 69.8-percent increase. The nation’s largest oil and gas company spent $12.45 million on lobbying in 2010 and made $928,959 in political contributions to Republicans and $109,500 to Democrats.

Chevron, which reported Q1 profits of $6.2 billion in 2011 compared to $4.55 billion in 2010, spent more on lobbying in 2010 ($12.89 million)but less on political contributions ($473,000 to Republicans and $122,000 to Democrats).

While citing a growing number of Republicans on the record backing an end to oil and gas subsidies – including House Speaker John Boehner- Checks and Balances points out key Republican committee members continue to block such efforts, including House Natural Resources Committee subcommittee Chairman Doug Lamborn of Colorado.

“These profit reports show big oil is making big bucks from high gas prices at the pump,” Denver-based Checks and Balances Deputy Director Matt Garrington said in a release.

“Big oil spent $63 million lobbying Congress and $2 million in campaign contributions last year so politicians would hand out $4 billion every year in taxpayer-funded subsidies.”
Lamborn last month voted against ending royalty relief for offshore drilling companies and has been hammering on Interior Secretary Ken Salazar for policies limiting drilling on federal lands. Salazar fired back that oil and gas companies aren’t coming close to utilizing all the leases they currently hold on public lands around the nation.

In his national radio address on Saturday, President Barack Obama said he wants Congress to end $4 billion in annual tax breaks for the oil and gas industry, according to the Associated Press.

“These tax giveaways aren’t right,” Obama said. “They aren’t smart. And we need to end them. An investment in clean energy today is an investment in a better tomorrow, and I think that’s an investment worth making.”

AP reported that “drivers in 22 states are paying more than the national average of $3.91 per gallon. In Alaska, California and Connecticut, it’s $4.20 or more,” slowing economic growth. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said he will weigh Obama’s proposal as early as this week.

Special thanks to Richard Charter

New York Times’ The Caucus blog: Week Ahead: Debt Ceiling and Gas Prices Still Focus of Congress & more…

by Carl Hulse, 5-3-11

The killing of Osama bin Laden will dominate Congressional conversations this week, but top aides said Monday that lawmakers still intended to pursue their planned agenda as members of the House and Senate return from spring break.

That means plenty of talk about the debt limit fight as well as efforts by House Republicans and Senate Democrats to try to score quick political victories tied to consumer unrest over rising gas prices.

The House leadership has scheduled votes for Thursday on a pair of bills that would spur more offshore oil and gas exploration and expedite the permitting process. Top Republicans see those measures as reinforcing their argument that Democrats and the Obama administration are partly responsible for rising prices at the pump because they have stifled domestic production.

In the Senate, Senator Harry Reid, the Nevada Democrat and majority leader, is pursuing the issue from another direction with a push to eliminate billions of dollars in special tax breaks for oil companies rolling in big profits at the moment.

“We need to take away the subsidies of these five major oil companies,” Mr. Reid told reporters last week. “I’m going to try to get it done as soon as I can do it procedurally in the Senate here.”

The votes are likely to make good theater but probably won’t produce any immediate results since the Senate is unlikely to take up the House bills, and the House doesn’t seem inclined to consider cutting oil company subsidies at the moment.

In another politically charged series of votes, the House is set to vote Tuesday on a plan to block the administration from spending money on some key initiatives related to the new health care law. Oneof the measures would block grants that are to go to states to set up new health insurance exchanges for consumers – a central element of the health law.

Since they have been unable to overturn the legislation outright, House Republicans intend to go after the law piece by piece. But the proposals appear to have little chance at even being considered in the Senate, leaving a stalemate. The House is expected to vote Wednesday on a measure to prohibit federal dollars from being spent on abortions, a policy that is now in place under a ban that is renewed annually.

The Senate career of Senator John Ensign, Republican of Nevada, officially concludes with his resignation as of May 3. Representative Dean Heller, a House member from Nevada who was already running for the seat in the 2012 election, has been appointed to fill the vacancy and could be sworn in quickly.

The bipartisan leadership of the Congress is scheduled to dine at the White House on Monday with President Obama and his wife. And Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. is set to convene negotiations over how to rein in the deficit at a meeting with Congressional officials on Thursday.

Potential Mideast unrest should not impact gas price debate

Darren Goode, Politico, 5-2-11

On the surface, the killing of Osama bin Laden is a tailor-made argument for lawmakers about the need to reduce America’s dependence on foreign oil amid the record high gasoline prices this spring.

Indeed, the Al Qaeda leader’s death may be the most tactile reminder of U.S. entanglements in the Middle East and Central Asia. But the reality is bin Laden’s death most likely won’t affect oil prices that much considering he’s been on the run for over a decade and the latest run-up in crude prices is primarily due to political uncertainty in Arab countries.

That means members of Congress are thus far steering clear and staying on message as they prepare for several weeks of bickering over gas prices.

“Any realistic discussion of oil politics and gas prices has always involved the inherent instability of Middle East politics whether or not Osama Bin Laden was alive or dead,” said Eben Burnham-Snyder, spokesman for House Natural Resources Committee ranking member Ed Markey (D-Mass.).

House and Senate leaders will press ahead as scheduled on the floor and before the TV cameras with a debate that largely pits Republican plans to expand domestic oil and gas drilling against a White House-led effort to scale back billions in oil industry tax incentives.

The average price of a gallon of gasoline is $3.96, the Energy Information Administration reported Monday.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0511/54100.html#ixzz1LIKp7YfM

POLITICS: Amid reactions to bin Laden’s death, many ask, ‘What about gas prices?’

Anne C. Mulkern, E&E Daily, 5-2-11

After learning that U.S. forces had killed Osama bin Laden, Republican Sen. James Inhofe of Oklahoma proclaimed, “We rejoice that this monster is dead.”

Inhofe and other lawmakers praised the news and the efforts that led to the death. But the American moment of victory appeared short-lived. On social networking sites Facebook and Twitter, many urged President Obama and Congress to put the focus back on fuel costs.

“Now that he is dead! Can we get some substantial relief at the Gas pump,” Neal Harris wrote on the Facebook page of Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.). “We need some investigating of the oil market and who is behind of the inflating speculations of the oil …America is Going down the Tubes. It cost me over a hundred dollars to fill my truck with the cheap alcohol stuff that gets less miles per gallon. Help … the need is now.”

Alli Rhae Belenger of Boston tweeted, “I’ll give Obama all the praise in the world for killing Bin Laden; but because of him I gotta pay hundreds for Health Care and $3.99 for gas.”

A woman using the Twitter handle Akhmed wrote, “Now that Osama is dead, will the gas prices go down? Cause that’s all I care bout ha.”

Others saw conspiracy in Obama’s announcement about bin Laden.

“The only reason Obama tellin people Im dead is so he can raise gas prices,” tweeted someone using the moniker “OsamaBinIaden.” Eliza Lily Rodriguez of New York tweeted, “Now how about those gas prices Obama?”

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) fielded questions today about the bin Laden apprehension’s potential impact on world oil markets. “I think the international economic community is relieved that this man is out of circulation,” he told reporters.

Most lawmakers steered clear of gas prices and praised the actions that led to bin Laden’s death.

http://www.eenews.net/Greenwire/2011/05/02/3/

Survey: Gas Prices Cause Shoppers To Downgrade

Jonathan Welsh, Wall Street Journal, 5-3-11

Rising fuel prices are getting the attention of car shoppers and compelling many to shift their priorities for picking a new vehicle. More than half of consumers surveyed said they have already lowered their sights somewhat regarding the next cars they plan to buy.

Kelley Blue Book, an auto industry research company that tracks vehicle pricing and consumer trends, says 84% of shoppers responding to its Market Intelligence survey in April said gasoline prices have influenced the types of vehicles they consider buying. The survey results show a steady increase this year in the importance of fuel prices in purchasing decisions.

Kelley says the number of consumers who say better fuel economy was their main reason for planning to purchase their next vehicle has risen 12% since the beginning of the year through April. According to the survey, 58% percent of people responding said the economy has caused them to make downgrades including picking smaller vehicles and smaller engine sizes. Consumers also said they plan to forgo certain extra-cost optional equipment. The company said 32% are considering buying a used vehicle instead of a new one.

http://blogs.wsj.com/drivers-seat/2011/05/02/survey-gas-prices-cause-shoppers-to-downgrade/?mod=google_news_blog

U.S. gas prices rise again

Dan Berman, Politico, 5-3-11

The average price of a gallon of regular gasoline continued its march to $4, hitting $3.96, the Energy Information Administration reported Monday afternoon.

That’s 8 cents higher than last week and 86 cents higher than on Jan. 31.

Premium unleaded buyers are paying an average of $4.20 pergallon, also an 8 cent increase from last week.

To be sure, prices are much higher in several states and cities. According to AAA, motorists in California will pay $4.26 for a gallon of regular on average, $4.15 in New York and $4.12 in the District of Columbia.

Want to save money? Head to the Rocky Mountains. In Colorado, drivers pay an average of $3.68 per gallon of regular. It’s $3.66 in Montana and $3.60 in Wyoming.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0511/54146.html#ixzz1LIL1x9I4

Ouch! $5-a-gallon gas in future?

United Press International, 5-2-11

NEW YORK, May 2 (UPI) — Gas prices already hover around $4 a gallon across the United States, causing a few analysts to say shelling out $5 a gallon later this year isn’t a stretch.

But they’re in the minority. The more common view among energy-sector analysts is that gasoline prices this year won’t climb by another 28 percent needed to hit the $5 mark, The Christian Science Monitor reported.

Nine states and the District of Columbia already pay more than $4 a gallon. The average price of $3.91 per gallon of regular unleaded gasoline on Monday was $3.952, the AAA Daily Fuel Gauge Report indicated.

Gas prices have jumped 36 percent during the past year, zinging consumers in the wallet and challenging the prospect economic growth could slow down as a result.

http://www.upi.com/Business_News/2011/05/02/Ouch-5-a-gallon-gas-in-future/UPI-13121304353983/#ixzz1LIQCsg5K

Buffett, Welch say gas prices could hurt economy

Associated Press, 5-2-11

OMAHA, Neb. — Berkshire Hathaway CEO Warren Buffett and former General Electric Co. CEO Jack Welch both say the economy is improving, but rising gas and food prices could hurt growth.

The two revered businessmen appeared together on CNBC Monday. Buffett’s interview had been scheduled to discuss last weekend’s Berkshire Hathaway ( BRK – news – people )shareholders meeting, but the death of Osama bin Laden was also discussed.

Buffett said the reports he gets from Berkshire’s 80-odd businesses show the economy is still improving slowly except for businesses related to the U.S. housing market.

But Buffett and Welch both expressed concern that rising gas and food prices will hurt consumer spending.

Welch says the increase in gas prices sucked $100 billion out of the economy in the first quarter.

http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2011/05/02/general-industrials-us-buffett-media_8444971.html

Bin Laden death spurs wild oil ride, but prices stillclimb

Mark Glover, The Sacramento Bee, 5-3-11

The death of Osama bin Laden sent crude oil on a roller coaster ride Monday but appears unlikely to stop the ongoing spike in gas prices.

The average retail price of gas in the Sacramento area rose 4.5 cents to $4.19 a gallon over the past week, according to Monday’s weekly report by SactoGasPrices.com, a GasBuddy.com website.

The previous week, area prices were virtually unchanged.

The current price is $1.13 a gallon higher than it was a year ago and 19.1 cents higher than a month ago.

Nationally, the average price spiked 7.1 cents last week to $3.92 a gallon – 29.2 cents higher than last month and up $1.01 from last year.

For a second week, analysts noted that the nation’s stocks of motor gasoline and gasoline-blending components are shrinking -205.5 million barrels vs. 219.7 million on March 18.

“Gas supply certainly does trump everything else,” said Jason Toews,co-founder of GasBuddy. “The changeover from winter to summer(blend) gas and some refinery outages have been pushing prices up.

“Anything that (depletes) supply makes the price go up. And if supply dries up, then you have panic buying.”

http://www.sacbee.com/2011/05/03/3596511/bin-laden-death-spurs-wild-oil.html#ixzz1LIGwOjnF

Gas prices set record in Chicago

Chicago Tribune, 5-2-11

U.S. gasoline prices surged ever closer to the $4-a-gallon threshold in the latest week, placing more pressure on lawmakers to show voters they are working to provide relief at the pump.

In Chicago, the average price for a gallon of gasoline jumped 10 cents to hit $4.352 over the past week, the Energy Department said. That exceeds the city’s all-time high of $4.303 set on July 7, 2008.

From the White House to Congress, politicians facing election next year are eager to appear active on this issue, which could prove difficult to fix in the short run.

The average price of U.S. gasoline jumped 8.4 cents to $3.96 a gallon in the week ending Monday, the U.S. Energy Information Administration said a weekly update.

Gasoline is up $1.07 a gallon compared to a year ago, with oil above $113 a barrel on Middle East unrest and a weak dollar.

Consumers in New England, the Midwest and on the West Coast were already facing fuel costs averaging above $4 a gallon.

The skyrocketing gasoline prices have lawmakers scrambling to act, but there is little they can do to lower fuel costs quickly, analysts said.

“The political pressure is very strong and the need to do something is very strong, but I don’t expect there are many things they can do that will give immediate relief,” said David Pumphrey, of the Center for Strategic and International Studies, who once worked at the Department of Energy.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/breaking/chibrkbus-gas-prices-jump-again-in-us-set-record-in-chicago-20110502,0,4508145.story

Pump shock: Gas average near $4

Thomas Grillo, Boston Herald, 5-2-11

The Bay State’s average gasoline price rose sharply over the past week, creeping closer to the psychological level of $4 per gallon and sparking fears of pain at the pumps this summer.

In July 2008, gas prices peaked at $4.09 a gallon in Massachusetts and $4.11 a gallon nationwide.

“There’s a 50/50 chance that we will surpass that record,”said Patrick DeHaan, senior petroleum analyst at GasBuddy.com.”Prices traditionally peak in the first week in May, but it’s unclear what impact Osama bin Laden’s death will have on the oil markets.”

AAA Southern New England’s weekly survey of Massachusetts gas prices found self-serve, regular averaging $3.95 per gallon, up 12cents in a week and 88 cents since the start of the year. A year ago, gas averaged $2.86.

The range in gas prices from station to station is a whopping 86 cents, according to BostonGasPrices.com. The lowest price of $3.83 was reported at Prime Energy in Burlington yesterday and the highest price of $4.69 at United in Lexington.

A report tomorrow from the U.S. Department of Energy on the nation’s gas supply and demand will shed more light on whether average prices will top the state record set nearly three years ago.If gas supplies continue to fall, DeHaan said, prices will rise. If supplies are up, prices should level off, he added.

“There’s no way to predict pricing until we see those numbers,” DeHaan said.

Matthew LeLacheur, executive director of the New England Service Station and Automotive Repair Association, said it’s hard to imagine gas prices falling anytime soon.

“Short of settlement of the unrest in the Middle East which will probably get more restless after the death of Osama, I can’t see prices falling,” he said. “Prices typically rise in the summer because it’s more expensive to refine summer fuel than winter fuel.”

http://www.bostonherald.com/business/general/view/2011_0503pump_shock_gasaverage_near_4/srvc=home&position=recent

Eliminating Oil Subsidies: Two Cheers For President Obama

Jerry Taylor and Peter Van Doren, Forbes, 5-3-11

Last week President Barack Obama responded to rising public anger over soaring gasoline prices by banging the drums for the elimination of various tax breaks enjoyed by the oil and gas industry. Although House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, initially suggested that he might be open to President Obama’s proposal, the House GOP leadership chose to answer the president’s weekly radio address–which advocated elimination of those tax breaks–with freshman Tea Party Congressman James Lankford, R-Okla., who charged that the plan was about “hiking taxes by billions of dollars.”

“The president may think he’s punishing CEOs of big companies,” said Lankford, “but his plan will hurt the everyday consumer of energy and imperil the jobs of millions of hardworking people in American-based companies.”

First of all, let the record show that President Obama is right and the GOP is wrong about these tax breaks. They make the economy less–not more–efficient and do nothing to reduce prices at the pump.

Although the president hopes to eliminate eight specific tax breaks–which cost the Treasury $43.6 billion over 10 years–only three, accounting for $31.9 billion of that total, are particularly important. Conservatives have no business defending any of them.

The largest tax break at issue is a tax credit passed in 2005, which is available to all U.S. manufacturers. Oil and gas companies qualify for that credit, so they will likely deduct somewhere in the neighborhood of $18.3 billion from their tax bill over the next 10 years. Note that this isn’t really an “oil subsidy”; it’s a manufacturing subsidy that oil and gas companies–along with many other companies–enjoy.

Rigging the tax code to make investments in manufacturing artificially more attractive than investments in something else is an enterprise designed to harm non-manufacturers for the benefit of …manufacturers. Conservatives who want government to leave markets alone have no business throwing their political bodies in front of this tax break. If their political rhetoric means anything, they would see the president’s bid and raise him by calling for total repeal of this tax break for everyone, not just for oil and gas companies.

http://www.forbes.com/2011/05/02/eliminate-oil-subsidies.html

Special thanks to Richard Charter

Houston Chronicle: Let’s cut off the subsidies to profitable oil companies

By WILLIAM H. MEADOWS
HOUSTON CHRONICLE

April 28, 2011, 8:56PM

There was an oil spill on Capitol Hill this week, when the truth about tax giveaways to the oil industry spilled from House Speaker John Boehner’s mouth. Asked why the oil industry should continue to receive $4 billion in tax giveaways while Congress cuts programs for people in poverty and the House prepares to vote next week on legislation to expedite offshore development without new safety requirements, the speaker sprang a leak. Oil and gas producers are “gonna pay their fair share in taxes and they should,” Boehner told a reporter for ABC News, opening the door to ending subsidies that have benefited the oil companies at taxpayers’ expense since the 1920s.

This is the same industry that fights safety inspections, complains about environmental safeguards critical to protecting wildlife refuges and community water supplies, pressures Congress to gut environmental laws and blocks attempts to ensure that the taxpaying public gets fair value through royalties when they exploit our public lands.

President Barack Obama was right to seize on the momentum of Boehner’s remarks, calling on Boehner and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to “take immediate action to eliminate unwarranted tax breaks for the oil and gas industry,” while instructing the Justice Department to investigate price gouging from oil companies.

Reid has stated his intent to hold a vote on the subsidies once the Senate returns to work after the Easter recess.

The case to end the subsidies is hard to ignore, especially when the oil companies’ quarterly profits are announced, as they were over the last few days. In the first three months of the year, oil and gas companies have raked in billions in profits. Exxon Mobil led the pack, earning more than $10 billion in the quarter, followed closely by Shell with nearly $9 billion. BP, scarcely a year after being partly responsible for the worst oil spill disaster in U.S. history, made more than $7 billion in earnings, despite trying to hold back research money into how extensively the shellfish industry has been harmed by the spill.

While the global price of oil is skyrocketing because of unrest in the Middle East and speculators on Wall Street, oil companies are pulling massive profits by taking oil from American lands.

According to the federal government’s Energy Information Administration, the average cost to produce a barrel of oil in the United States is approximately $30.

So when oil companies sell a barrel for triple the cost – $100 or more, as they have been for months – the oil industry is pocketing at least $70, and passing the cost on to the consumers.

To add to the case against oil subsidies, look no further than Capitol Hill, where the ongoing budget battle is putting critical spending at risk. In that environment, where severe cuts to environmental protection programs, education and programs like Medicare are being threatened, there’s no place for the oil industry giveaways that cost taxpayers $40 billion each decade.

These subsidies cannot be defended. With the evidence against them piling up and oil companies reporting huge profits, the tide finally may be turning against the subsidies. Let’s hope that as momentum builds to end giveaways to big oil, it will be the beginning of an energy policy that relies less on an industry that rakes in huge profits while it takes from Americans on their tax returns and at the pump.

Meadows is president of The Wilderness Society.
Special thanks to Richard Charter.

ABC News: President Obama Urges Congress to Eliminate Oil Company Subsidies

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/obama-urges-congress-eliminate-oil-company-subsidies/story?id=13462559

House Speaker John Boehner talks exclusively with ABC’s Jonathan Karlin Hamilton, Ohio.ABC News

AUTO START:ON|OFF

By JONATHAN KARL (@jonkarl) and BENFORER
April 26, 2011

President Obama sent a letter toCongressional leaders today, saying he was “heartened” byHouse Speaker John Boehner’s statement that he was willing to considercutting multi-billion dollar subsidies to oil companies, and urginglawmakers to act.

The president said Congress should “take immediate action toeliminate unwarranted tax breaks for the oil and gas industry and usethe dollars to invest in clean energy.”

Boehner had stunned Washington on Monday when he told ABC News thatcutting the subsidies to oil companies is “certainly something weshould be looking at.”

“We are in a time when the federal government’s short onrevenues. We need to control spending, but we need to have revenues toget the government moving,” Boehner said. “They ought to bepaying their fair share.”

Congressional Democrats pounced on the issue today. Sen. ChuckSchumer, D-N.Y., applauded Boehner for “see[ing] the light”on the “insanity of providing subsidies to profit-soaked big oilcompanies.”

The topic dominated the White House press briefing.

“Immediate action means what it says,which is when Congress comes back, let’s take action legislatively toeliminate those subsidies,” White House spokesman Jay Carneysaid. “[It’s] hard to argue that given where the price of oil isnow that there’s a need for subsidies of the oil and gasindustry.”

Carney was referring to a statement earlier this year by former ShellCEO John Hofmeister, in which he said: “In the face of sustainedhigh oil prices, it was not an issue for large companies of needingthe subsidies to entice us into looking for and producing moreoil.”

In all, the tax breaks, many designed to encourage moreexploration, cost taxpayers more than $4billion a year in lost revenue — enough for 1.4 million Americans tobuy a tank full of gas every week for an entireyear.

However, the oil companies do have friends in Congress and thePresident’s letter demanding immediate action hit with a thud. Boehnerand Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell rejected the proposal.Boehner’s spokesman said the plan was insufficient because it would”only raise taxes and increase prices at thepump.”

ABC News asked the 10 members of Congress who received the mostcampaign contributions from the oil industry in the last election ifthey’d be willing to cut the tax breaks. Most have yet to respond, andSen. David Vitter, R-La., told ABC News that he’d only be open toeliminating tax breaks if tax rates were also lowered.

“I’m open to ending most tax exemptions, deductions and creditsif we use the resulting revenue to lower all rates, much as thepresident’s deficit commission suggested,” Vitter said in astatement. “Part of the reason for these provisions is that wehave the highest corporate tax rate in the world, which kills Americanjobs.”

House Speaker JohnBoehner Weighs in on Gas Prices Watch Video

Boehner: GasPrices Could Cost Obama Election Watch Video

Barack Obama on Howto Bring Down Gas Prices Watch Video

_________________

http://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/the-monitors-view/2011/0426/High-gas-prices-and-oily-political-rhetoric-don-t-mix

Christian Science Monitor

Editorial

The Monitor’sView

High gasprices and oily political rhetoric don’t mix

President Obamaand Republicans eye rising gasoline prices and think 2012. Too many oftheir responses aren’t aimed at weaning America offoil.

By the Monitor’s EditorialBoard / April26, 2011

Trying to tank up less often? GOP andDemocratic leaders are doing the opposite – filling up on politicalrhetoric to score points or deflect criticism at a time of risinggasoline prices.

Like a desert-highway mirage, the political back-and-forth couldmislead Americans as to what lies ahead.

Republicans, focused on gains to be made in 2012, see prices in the$4-a-gallon range as a reason to blame President Obama – just asDemocrats blamed President Bush for the record high price at the pumpin 2008, when the national average hit $4.11 in July.

One “mirage” lies in three House billspassed by the Republican-controlled Natural Resources Committee. Thelegislation expands offshore oil drilling. But backers convenientlyoverlook the fact that more offshore drilling wouldn’t change gasprices for at least 10 years, and even then marginally – by perhaps3 cents a gallon, according to studies by the Energy InformationAdministration.

In March, Republicans launched an attack ad against Rep. Nick Rahallover gas prices. The Democrat from West Virginia used to head theNatural Resources Committee, and last year pushed safety andenvironmental improvements for offshore drilling. He opposes theGOP’s three drilling bills.

House Speaker John Boehner says higher gas prices could cost PresidentObama his office, and this is not lost on the president. Mr. Obama’sratings have dropped as gas prices have risen. Seven in 10 Americanssay high gas prices are a financial hardship, according to aWashington Post/ABC News poll this week. Looking toward Obama’s 2012reelection bid, 53 percent of those who feel serious hardship from gasprices say they definitely won’t vote for Obama.

In the president’s weekly radio address on Saturday, he said he hadappointed a task force to root out fraud or manipulation in the oilmarkets. He pushed ending the almost $4 billion in annual tax breaksto the oil and gas industry – a populist idea that Mr. Boehnersuddenly embraced this week. Obama also blasted Republican plans tocut investment in clean energy by 70 percent.

But, sorry America, despite the promises of politicians, neitheroffshore drilling, nor a fraud investigation, nor an end to bigoil’s tax benefits will relieve gasoline prices any time soon, if atall.

Those are insignificant when you look at some of the causes of theprice surge, such as Middle East turmoil and global economic recovery.The Great Recession and slow recovery gave the world a three-yearreprieve from the broad trend that will inevitably sustain higherprices: emerging, gas-guzzling economies such as China and India vyingfor a limited supply of oil.

Neither the president nor Congress have much influence over thesetrends. The best thing to do, then, is for the country’s leaders tochange America’s fuel diet by encouraging less demand for oilthrough conservation and efficiency, and by supporting investment innonoil fuels.

President Obama got at this when he said “there’s no silver bulletthat can bring down gas prices right away.”

The harder truth is that high prices are likely to continue. They willactually help speed the coming and necessary transition from oildependence, because high prices make the status quo souncomfortable.

America’s drivers, especially those on a fixed income,understandably have a hard time with this truth. They want immediaterelief. There is a sure-fire way to get that, though: Drive less, evenbuy a more fuel-efficient vehicle.

Admittedly, that’s not possible for everyone. Yet 6 in 10 Americanssay they are cutting back on driving, according to the WashingtonPost/ABC poll. As a result of the last gas-price surge, Americanstelecommuted more, rode bikes more often, and used more publictransport – often with the assistance of their employers. Fromdriving more slowly to moving closer to work, there are many ways tocut fuel use.

Drivers can take these steps, while higherprices do their work to change the longer-term fuel mix.

Special thanks to Richard Charter

"Be the change you want to see in the world." Mahatma Gandhi