E&E Publishing: $11M ad campaign will promote comprehensive energy, emissions bill

Robin Bravender
E&E Publishing
June 24, 2010

Environmentalists are joining military and union groups in launching an $11 million advertising campaign aimed at prodding the Senate to pass sweeping energy and climate legislation this summer.

The League of Conservation Voters, Sierra Club, VoteVets.org Action Fund and Service Employees International Union announced today that they will launch the first round of television ads next week in a handful of states, targeting about four or five “key” senators. They plan to continue running ads throughout the summer as the Senate moves forward on an energy and climate bill.

Leaders of the organizations declined to say which senators they would zero in on, but they said the first round of ads will likely target senators who voted earlier this month to support a failed bid by Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) to block U.S. EPA climate regulations.”This diverse set of groups has come together because we are at a pivotal moment in which senators face a stark choice: They can side with the Big Oil companies or fight for a clean energy future,” said LCV President Gene Karpinski. “And with this effort, we will make sure that constituents in key states know which side of this historic debate their senators choose.”The groups said they also intend to praise senators who support a comprehensive climate bill that caps greenhouse gas emissions.

Senate Democrats are expected to meet this afternoon to map out a strategy for tackling energy and climate legislation this summer, and President Obama is expected to discuss the issue with senators during a meeting next week.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has said he hopes to take a package to the floor before the August recess. Special thanks to Richard Charter.

Washington Post: Apparent suicide by fishing boat captain underlines oil spill’s emotional toll

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/23/AR2010062305361.html?hpid=topnews

Oil spill fallout causes emotional, psychological stress

As BP works to contain the environmental damage of the oil spill in the Gulf, many residents are having a tough time dealing with the emotional and psychological effects. Ministers and social workers are worried about increased stress and depression.

By Dana Hedgpeth and David A. Fahrenthold
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, June 24, 2010

Allen Kruse had been a charter fishing boat captain for more than two decades — long enough that people called him by his boat’s name, Rookie, as if they were one and the same. But then, two months ago, the leaking BP oil well began pouring crude into the waters where he took families fishing for snapper and amberjack.
Two weeks and two days ago, with his fishing grounds closed, Kruse, 55, took a job working for BP’s cleanup crew. For the very people who’d caused the mess.

Other boat captains said Kruse, like them, found the effort confusing, overly bureaucratic and frustrating. He told them to keep their heads down, not to worry about the hassles. But those close to him saw he was losing weight.

On Wednesday morning, Kruse drove to his boat as usual. As the deckhands prepared for the day’s work, Kruse, as the captain, was supposed to turn on the generator. But after a few minutes, the crew members said, they didn’t hear anything and went looking for him. A deckhand found him in the wheelhouse, shot in the head.

The Baldwin County, Ala., coroner’s office called his death an apparent suicide and said Kruse didn’t leave a note. There’s no way to be sure why he would have taken his life. But his friends see the tragedy as a clear sign of the BP spill’s hidden psychological toll on the Gulf Coast, an awful feeling of helplessness that descends on people used to hard work and independence.

“We’re helping cover up the lie. We’re burying ourselves. We’re helping them cover up the [expletive] that’s putting us out of work,” said a 27-year-old deckhand who was working for Kruse on Wednesday and spoke on condition of anonymity. He said Kruse was facing the same problems as others in his business: “It’s just setting in with ’em, you know; reality’s kicking in. And there’s a lot of people that aren’t as happy as they used to be.”
Around the gulf, social service providers are dealing with a rising tide of mental health crises. Groups of Baptists are deploying extra chaplains in parishes along the coast. In southern Louisiana, where the impact was felt first, about 1,500 people have received counseling services from Catholic Charities.

From past disasters, such as the Exxon Valdez oil spill in 1989, health experts say they expect a wave of physical health problems, such as high blood pressure and heart disease. But they also expect more-subtle problems, as people absorb the spill’s impact on their lives: depression, anxiety, alcohol and drug abuse, domestic issues.

“We’re seeing already an increase in suspiciousness, arguing, domestic violence. . . . We’re already having reports of increased drinking, anxiety, anger and avoidance,” Howard J. Osofsky of the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in New Orleans said during a two-day hearing this week on the physical and emotional impact of the spill.
Michele Many, a social worker who helps fishermen’s wives, said the stress of the spill is compounded by its uncertainty. Oil is still pouring out, spreading, with an unmanageable toxicity that evokes comparisons to disease.

“The oil spill is like a cancer or tumor,” said Many, who works at Louisiana State University. “It is creeping and unpredictable from whether people will have livelihoods or health issues later from helping clean it up. You just don’t know whether it is benign or malignant.”

‘No end in sight’

In Lafitte, La., 200 hundred miles from the marina where Kruse died, Claudia Helmer heard about the suicide Wednesday afternoon.
“Oh, Lord,” she said. “That is really, really sad.”
And she immediately began to fret about her fisherman husband, Gerry, and their 19-year-old son, who were spending five days on the Gulf, helping clean up oil.
“I do worry that my husband isn’t one to show what he’s feeling,” she said. “He doesn’t want me to worry, but I do. I think he’s going to keep it all bundled up.”

She sees the stress in those around her. “I was with a next-door neighbor [Tuesday], and he’s a 42-year-old fisherman, and he just broke down crying,” she said. “It was a shock to see him so upset. He’s afraid we’re not going to have anything left. We all are.”

On Monday afternoon, Helmer chatted with a half-dozen other wives of fishermen as they sat in a crowded hall of a nearby Catholic church waiting for gift cards to a supermarket. Many agreed that their husbands — some of whom weren’t fishing and shrimping because the waters are closed, and others who are out helping to clean up oil — are in need of counseling. But few thought that their men, raised in the self-sufficient lifestyle of the bayous, would actually seek it.

Tony Speier, assistant deputy secretary of the Louisiana Office of Mental Health, said that what makes the oil spill harder for people to deal with than, say, a natural disaster such as Hurricane Katrina is that “people don’t know how long this is going to be.”

“They can’t put a psychological boundary on it and start their recovery because this is ongoing,” he said.

At Our Lady of the Isle Catholic Church in Grand Isle, La., the Rev. Mike Tran said he’s getting more phone calls from worried fishermen and their wives. He’s offering daily Masses and a support group for those trying to deal with the spill. Some parishioners have said they’re drinking more and have little energy — signs of possible depression.

“This is really taking a toll on people,” Tran said. “It’s devastating because it is dragging out. There seems to be no end in sight.”

Some in Louisiana were just getting their businesses back on their feet or moving back into rebuilt houses five years after Katrina.

Lorrie Grimaldi, her husband, Lance Melerine, and two young daughters recently moved before the spill into a new brick home after years of living in a FEMA-issued trailer and with family members after Katrina.

Now she’s worried about how much her husband, who’s trying to do some shrimping in waters that are open, will make this season. Her doctor put her on medication to help deal with her anxiety and the onset of depression.
“If his boat isn’t out, then we’re not making money,” said Grimaldi, 33. She said she and her husband rarely fought but now are snappy with each other and their kids.
“My daughter asks him, ‘Daddy, what’s wrong?’ ” she said. “He’ll just tell her, ‘Don’t worry about me. I’m supposed to worry about you.’ ” She said her husband used to sit up and talk with her and watch TV until midnight but now eats his dinner and goes to bed as soon as he gets home. “He’s sad, baby,” she tells her 9-year-old daughter, Laken.

‘Just like prison’

Kruse died at a marina in Gulf Shores, Ala., more than 200 miles from the Louisiana towns that felt the spill’s impact first.

As time passed, the oil spread toward the waters off Alabama, where Kruse used to take families out from 15 to 30 miles. Like most charter boat captains, who need to deliver a good time even when the fish don’t cooperate, he was as much entertainer as fisherman. Friends said Kruse would let little kids drive the boat and chat up the parents.
“Fishing was second. Fun was first,” the deckhand said.

But Thad Stewart, a friend who works at the Orange Beach, Ala., marina where Kruse docked his boat, said he noticed a difference about the time Kruse went to work for BP. “He stopped talking. That’s all there is to it. He stopped talking,” Stewart said. “I’m not saying that this was the cause of it . . . but he was seeing what was his home, which was the Gulf of Mexico, just be slowly destroyed.”

Frank Kruse, his identical twin brother who is a probate lawyer in Mobile, Ala., said his brother was waiting for about $70,000 in payments from BP for working two of his boats for the past two weeks. “There’s no question in my mind that this is directly related to the oil spill,” Frank Kruse said in a phone interview Wednesday night. “He had been losing weight. Every day he was worried.”

He said his brother “was very, very upset at the way BP was handling the oil spill. There was a lot of wasted money, a lot of wasted time. They’d give him a different story of what needed to be done.”

Frank said he had talked to one of Kruse’s captains the night before, who told him he should talk to his brother. “Before I could call him, one of his captains appeared at my door,” he said.

Tom Ard, another fishing boat captain, knew Kruse for 25 years.

“I could tell he was having a hard time coping,” said Ard, president of the Orange Beach Fishing Association. Kruse was on its board of directors.

Ard said BP has done everything it said it would do and that despite setbacks and delays, “they have been working hard to make things right.”
But Ard said Kruse “was just very stressed out. He was worried about getting paid from BP, about our livelihoods being taken out from under us. He was one of the top boats in this community. Everybody really looked up to him. It’s just a terrible loss, and it has really floored this whole community.
“This would not have happened if it weren’t for this oil spill,” Ard said. “Our livelihood has been pulled out from under us. We’re fishermen. Everything we got we built ourselves with our own hands. All of a sudden, we’re not in control of anything.”

In Kruse’s world, a lot of people were down. There were fights with wives, troubles over money and impending bills. Charter fishermen say they were glad they could make some money working for BP. But they were annoyed by the petty bureaucracy of it: the paperwork, the inane training in avoiding sunburns and wearing life jackets and tennis shoes instead of flip-flops, the runaround when somebody had a question.

Other fishermen, who looked up to Kruse as a veteran captain, turned to him for advice.
“His quote to me was, ‘Don’t try to rationalize it. . . . Just sign your name and get on your boat, and don’t try to tell anybody how to run the program, and don’t try to tell ’em what the local knowledge is,’ ” Capt. Chris Garner said. The point was: The cleanup is hopeless, and you’ll just tire yourself out trying to improve the situation. “I said, ‘Rookie, that sounds an awful lot like prison,’ ” meaning the loss of control, Garner said Wednesday. “He said, ‘That’s a pretty good analysis, Chris. It’s just like prison.’ And he didn’t make it another week.”

Staff writer Rob Stein and staff researcher Madonna Lebling contributed to this report.

Special thanks to Richard Charter

Miami Herald: Doctors call for help protecting Gulf oil spill workers

June 24, 2010

 http://www.miamiherald.com/2010/06/23/1697316/doctors-call-for-help-protecting.html

By Marisa Taylor
McClatchy Newspapers

WASHINGTON  A group of doctors who’ve tracked 9/11 rescue workers’ illnesses urged the Obama administration to “prevent a repetition of costly mistakes” made after the terrorist attacks by protecting Gulf Coast oil spill workers from toxic exposure.

In a letter McClatchy obtained that was sent to health and safety officials earlier this month, 14 doctors said oil spill workers should get the maximum level of protection from exposure in an effort to avoid the problems that arose after the Sept. 11 attacks.

After 9/11, health experts accused the Bush administration of withholding information about the toxicity of the air at the World Trade Center site from emergency workers and of being too slow to prevent exposure.

Long-term studies have since found that many 9/11 rescue workers and firefighters have suffered increased respiratory illnesses and reduced lung capacity.

“Failure to recognize the errors made from the response to the WTC disaster and a further failure to benefit from their attendant lessons may well lead to needless risk to human health in the Gulf and will amplify the human and financial costs associated with such risks,” the doctors wrote.

The group recommended that the program set up to track the health of the oil spill workers be sponsored by organizations other than BP. As it stands, the Obama administration is demanding that BP pay for the program.

The doctors wrote that the administration should “enforce applicable laws to the maximum extent possible, leaving as little as possible to the discretion of private industry.”

Critics are questioning whether the administration has left too many decisions about the health and safety of the estimated 37,000 oil spill workers to the discretion of BP as a growing number of them complain about exposure to toxins.

At least 74 spill workers have complained that they felt ill after exposure to air pollutants from the crude oil, dispersants and other toxins. Most of the symptoms  ranging from throat irritation to nausea and headaches  cleared up quickly.

While experts agree that the level of exposure is lower than federal safety standards permit, they say that what little information has been released offers more questions than answers.

Meanwhile, BP isn’t recording a majority of the exposures to air pollutants as part of its official tracking system of oil spill illnesses and injuries.

Adding to the concerns, workers are getting only the minimum hazardous-material training required, which is two to four hours. That’s because the administration chose to apply training standards that date to soon after the 1989 Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska.

Health and safety officials also have declined to push BP to provide respirators to many of the workers. They’re worried about requiring respirators prematurely, in part because of the summer heat that many workers are exposed to. Respirators could trigger heat exhaustion or worsen its symptoms.

MORE FROM MCCLATCHY
BP’s records on ill workers tell only part of the story
Contradicting BP, feds lay Gulf illnesses to cleaning fluid
BP ‘systemic failure’ endangers Gulf cleanup workers

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/06/15/95950/bps-records-on-ill-workers-tell.html

BP’s records on ill workers tell only part of the story
June 15, 2010

By Marisa Taylor | McClatchy Newspapers
WASHINGTON  Although Louisiana state records indicate that at least 74 oil spill workers have complained of becoming sick after exposure to pollutants, BP’s own official recordkeeping notes just two such incidents.

BP reported a wide range of worker injuries in the period from April 22 to June 10, from the minor  a sprained ankle, a pinched finger and a cat bite  to the more serious  three instances of workers being struck by lightning and one worker who lost part of a finger.

Only two were related to coming in contact with potentially toxic substances: a worker who in May was sprayed in the face with dispersant as he took a nozzle off a boom and another who inhaled crude oil vapors in June.

In contrast, Louisiana reports that 38 workers have reported becoming ill from dispersant or emulsified oil. Most of those said their symptoms cleared up quickly.

The gap between the state data and BP’s reflects the difficulty in tracking the health effects of toxins from the oil spill. It also raises questions about whether the federal government can rely on BP to determine whether conditions remain safe for the more than 27,000 workers now engaged in cleaning up the worst oil spill in the nation’s history.

State health officials note the limitations of their data, which is based on worker complaints.

“Some of these are objective (vomiting, for example), others are subjective (nausea, for example),” Louisiana’s Department of Health and Hospitals said Tuesday in its weekly report on oil spill exposure. “There are large variations in how subjective symptoms are perceived and reported.”

“There is no attempt made in this report to confirm the exact cause of symptoms or exposure,” the report cautioned.

BP didn’t respond to phone calls Tuesday seeking comment, but the company’s records probably don’t reflect the exposure that Louisiana tracked because Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations don’t require that they do. The company is expected only to record illnesses and injuries on the job that require treatment that entails more than first aid.

“Anybody who calls the poison control center or drops into the emergency room without being officially hospitalized may not reach the level of an OSHA recordable,” Jordan Barab, the deputy assistant secretary of labor for OSHA, told McClatchy in an interview.

A May 26 incident involving the hospitalization of seven oil spill workers on boats off the coast of Louisiana also doesn’t appear to be reflected in BP’s data.

Those workers were taken to the hospital after they experienced nausea, dizziness and headaches. BP and health officials suspect that a solution used for cleaning the decks of oil-contaminated vessels may have been one of the factors that contributed to sickening the workers. The day after BP reached this conclusion, BP chief executive Tony Hayward claimed that the illnesses might be unrelated to the spill and instead could be symptoms of food poisoning.

Barab said the gap in data doesn’t prevent OSHA from tracking health problems as they arise.

“We’re trying to go places no matter what the numbers say,” he said. “We’re trying to be everywhere we can be.”

Barab, however, said his agency is concerned that BP isn’t required to track cleanup workers hired by state and local governments.

“That doesn’t necessarily go under BP’s logs,” he said. “We’re not quite sure whose log that’s going on.”

OSHA can’t fine or cite BP or its contractors for worker safety violations on the ships and rigs working near the Deepwater Horizon site because its jurisdiction ends three miles off shore. Regulating worker safety on rigs falls to the Minerals Management Service or the Coast Guard.

MMS has been criticized for its lack of scrutiny of the oil and gas industry on many fronts. The “downside” of another agency asserting jurisdiction, Barab said, is that it “can have really lousy standards but we can’t do anything about it.”

So far, BP has complied voluntarily with regulations so the federal government has not had to cite or fine any of the companies involved, Barab said.

“At this point, the jurisdiction issue has not been a problem for us,” he said.

Special thanks for Richard Charter

Pensacola News Journal: Dolphin washes ashore, dies in rescue; Oil blackens Pensacola beach

http://www.pnj.com/article/20100624/NEWS01/6240324/Dolphin-washes-ashore-dies-in-rescue
KAYCEE LAGARDE AND BILL VILONA * KLAGARDE@PNJ.COM BVILONA@PNJ.COM * JUNE 24, 2010
Christy Travis first saw oil splotched along the beach as she approached the surf at Fort Pickens. Then she turned and saw a bottlenose dolphin in distress in shallow water.

“It was heartbreaking. Everyone was crying,” said Travis, 41, who was visiting with her family from Arkansas when they discovered the dolphin and joined with others in attempt to save it.

“We had oil all over us,” she said.
The dolphin died while enroute to Gulf World Marine Park, a rescue facility in Panama City.
Once the dolphin was discovered, a three-hour ordeal ensued to try and save it in the water. Two U.S. Coast Guard volunteers and a Florida Department of Environmental Protection officer were involved in the rescue attempt.

Travis said people scraped oil off the dolphin with their hands.

“It was so sad. It just broke our hearts,” Travis said.

A necropsy will be performed to determine the exact cause of death, according to Courtnee Ferguson, a spokeswoman for the Unified Command in Mobile.

Brian Sibley, another United Command spokesman, confirmed the dolphin “had some oil on it.” But he said he wasn’t sure if that was the reason the dolphin beached itself.
__________________
http://www.pnj.com/article/20100624/NEWS01/6240322/Oil-blackens-Pensacola-beach
Pensacola News Journal
Oil blackens Pensacola beach
BP’s mess closes stretch of Gulf to swimmers
JAMIE PAGE * JEPAGE@PNJ.COM * JUNE 24, 2010
For the first time since the Gulf of Mexico oil spill 65 days ago, emulsified oil in large patches stained the sugar-white sand on Pensacola Beach. Large numbers of tar balls continued to roll ashore.

A section of the Gulf along Pensacola Beach – but not the beach itself – was closed to swimming and wading after a health advisory was issued by the Escambia County Health Department.
Skimmer boats removed big mats of brown mousse that entered Pensacola Pass. And mousse also was seen along a three-mile stretch from Pensacola Beach Gulf Fishing Pier to the Fort Pickens gate ranger station.
“It is some nasty stuff out there,” Escambia Sheriff David Morgan said after an afternoon helicopter flyover.

“Escambia got a nice mousse-laying today for plus-or-minus six miles,” Florida Environmental Secretary Mike Sole said. “I’ve been saying all along we’d be getting tar balls. I was hoping to not see the mousse, but that’s what we got. Now the issue is how fast we get that off the beach. We need to up the response.”

On Tuesday night, beach cleanup workers hand-collected roughly 8 tons of tar balls from Johnson Beach on Perdido Key, according to a report by the Florida Division of Emergency Management.

“We have seen it stain the sand in small bits before but not as much as today,” said Keith Wilkins, the county’s deputy chief of the Neighborhood and Community Services Bureau.
“The tar balls were even more widespread today. I am not expecting it to slack off for another couple of days.”

The latest weather projections are likely to continue to push these impacts ashore along much of the Gulf front on Pensacola Beach.

The Gulf closure is from Park West at the Fort Pickens Gate recreation area through beach walkover No. 23, slightly west of Portofino.

The water in that area is closed until further notice. Double red flags posted on the beach mean civil citations can be issued by deputies to anyone disobeying lifeguards’ orders to stay out of the water.
Swimming and wading is still allowed in the Gulf east of walkover 23, and in the sound side, Health Department spokeswoman Molly Payne-Hardin said.

County Commission Chairman Grover Robinson IV said the immediate cleanup of oil and tar balls was hindered by bureaucratic red tape.

County officials were unable to take their usual helicopter tour of the Gulf on Wednesday morning because of unfavorable weather conditions. When county oil monitors noticed the significant impacts to Pensacola Beach later in the morning, county officials asked BP to send out beach cleanup equipment, such as sand sifter rakes that remove tar balls.
Robinson said county staff was told that BP would first have to get written approval from Unified Command in Mobile before it could send beach cleaning equipment for the National Seashore area. So, the county asked that equipment be sent for other areas of Pensacola Beach that are not part of the National Seashore.
But no equipment arrived.

“It was ridiculous,” Robinson said. “They had promised this wasn’t going to happen and that they would be right there with us. We were supposed to have the flexibility to say if we need something, get out here.”

BP spokeswoman Liz Castro said the reason the rakes were not sent was because they would have created much worse environmental damage by spreading the oil.

“With the consistency of the oil today, combined with the heat of the day, the beach rakes would have created a hazmat situation,” Castro said. “It was pretty bad today. We are using the manual workers right now because it is the most environmentally safe way to do it.”
Roughly 945 cleanup workers were working on beaches in Escambia and Santa Rosa counties during the day Wednesday, while 220 were on the night shift, Castro said. The rakes also are used at night and during the cooler early morning hours.

Dragging rakes on the beach when the tar balls are hot, smears the oil into the sand and makes it harder to clean up, Wilkins said.

Skimmer boats were working in Pensacola Pass, Perdido Pass, and offshore in the Gulf to deal with the heavy oil coming in, Wilkins said.

Escambia officials said that Coast Guard Rear Adm. James Watson – who is running operations for the full Unified Command effort – was responsive Wednesday and got the heavy equipment like front-loaders and road graders needed to quickly move a lot of sand on site at Pensacola Beach.

Special thanks to Richard Charter

Nature Editorial: A Full Accounting. The BP spill should help make the case for bringing ecosystem services into the economy.

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v465/n7301/full/465985b.html
Nature 465, 985-986 (24 June 2010) doi:10.1038/465985b
Published online 23 June 2010
       
On 14 June, BP promised to put US$20 billion into an escrow account to pay for damage caused by the 22 April sinking of its Deepwater Horizon drilling platform off the coast of Louisiana – an event that has left a geyser of crude oil gushing into the Gulf of Mexico for two months, at a rate currently estimated as high as 60,000 barrels (9.5 million litres) a day. The beneficiaries of this fund are expected to be fishermen, hoteliers, charter-boat operators and other Gulf-coast business owners who have lost income, as well as states and other entities with clean-up costs.

Left unclear, however, is whether payment will ever be made for the loss of ‘ecosystem services’ that benefit everyone but are owned by no one. One such service is the carbon sequestration provided by marsh plants and ocean plankton. How will BP make good the value lost if the oil kills enough of them to hasten climate change? Another service is the buffering that coastal marshes provide to nearby communities from the Gulf’s many hurricanes. Who pays if the oil destroys the marshes entirely?

The 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska raised similar questions, and sparked a flurry of research in the once-obscure discipline of ecological economics, which seeks to estimate quantities such as the ‘replacement cost’ of an ecosystem – or even an individual organism. (Killer whales cost $300,000 at the time; cormorants were a bargain at $310 apiece.) The Gulf oil spill seems likely to inspire another surge of research in this field. Indeed, ecological economist Robert Costanza at the University of Vermont in Burlington has already estimated a $34-billion to $670-billion price tag for the loss of Gulf ecosystem services.

Costanza also has a suggestion for how to avoid such harm in the future: force companies that want to drill, dig or otherwise extract resources to take a more serious account of environmental risks before they start. He and his colleagues have argued that the best way to do this is to demand that each company put up an “assurance bond”: a sum of money large enough to rectify damages if things go wrong (see http://go.nature.com/styAyz). The amount of the bond would be set by an independent government agency or government-chartered body, and be based on the total value of the ecosystems at risk. In BP’s case, Constanza says, the company would have had to put up something like $50 billion to get permission to drill in the Gulf, or about two to three times the $20 billion they are having to pay now. The very size of that bond, in turn, might have made the company more likely to invest, say, $500,000 in a functional blowout preventer.

Other experts favour a variant of this idea in which large, risky enterprises would be required to carry insurance against ecosystem services claims – an approach that would essentially put the insurance companies in charge of policing safety practices.

These and other variants seem well worth exploring as a way to bring ownerless ecosystem services into the marketplace. Congress and the US administration should take the idea seriously. But the science behind putting a price on nature must also improve.
After all, any attempt to extract a multi-billion-dollar compensation for ecosystem damage seems likely to wind up in court. So scientists’ cost estimates will have to be sound enough to convince judges and juries, not just make for an interesting journal article.
Such an increase in rigour is hardly bad news for research. If ecosystems services science gets a boost from the spill, that may be one of the few silver linings to the dark plume that continues to gush in the Gulf of Mexico.
_____________________________________
Comments
        1.      2010-06-23 03:15 AM
     2.      Report this comment #11363
      3.      Anurag Chaurasia said:
        4.      Any damage done to environment is priceless. Money can not return a life to any living creature. We should inculcate this priceless feeling for environment in each one of us. Oil spill culprit should be put behind the bar instead of asking for monetry compensation in order to minimize such accidents in the future. If accident is becouse of nonhuman factor certainly then editor idea of ecological economics is very promising.
Anurag chaurasia,ICAR,India,anurag@nbaim.org,anurag_vns1@yahoo.co.in,+919452196686(M)
   5.      2010-06-23 08:44 AM
     6.      Report this comment #11369

        7.      David Julian said:
        8.      Environmentalists have long been arguing that ecosystem services needed to be accounted for. Its a pity that it required such a visible disaster to make this flaw in our economic system apparent. Remember also that Nigeria, and other countries, have been suffering at the hands of the oil industry for decades, with massive quantities of oil destroying ecosystems there, largely beyond the scrutiny of all but those directly impacted by it. Yet these cumulative attacks on the ecosystem have a global impact, in terms of loss of biodivesity (essential for healthy ecosystem function), impacts of the carbon budget and other natural systems. Just because an ecological disaster occurs in a rich western country does not mean it has a greater ecological impact that those that occur under the radar, in poorer countries with less regulation and less scrutiny. Ecosystems needed to be valued globally and the difficulty is building a global monitoring and regulatory frame work.

Special thanks to Richard Charter

"Be the change you want to see in the world." Mahatma Gandhi