{"id":5087,"date":"2013-12-17T17:58:33","date_gmt":"2013-12-17T17:58:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.reefrelieffounders.com\/drilling\/?p=5087"},"modified":"2013-12-17T17:58:34","modified_gmt":"2013-12-17T17:58:34","slug":"los-angeles-times-new-campaign-for-a-california-oil-extraction-tax-underway","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.reefrelieffounders.com\/drilling\/2013\/12\/17\/los-angeles-times-new-campaign-for-a-california-oil-extraction-tax-underway\/","title":{"rendered":"Los Angeles Times:  New campaign for a California oil extraction tax underway"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/local\/lanow\/la-me-ln-new-campaign-for-california-oil-extraction-tax-underway-20131216,0,3099963.story<\/p>\n<p>By Phil Willon<br \/>\nDecember 16, 2013, 4:04 p.m.<br \/>\nSan Francisco Bay Area hedge fund manager Tom Steyer on Monday launched a statewide campaign, aimed at prompting action by state lawmakers, to impose a new extraction tax on oil produced in California.<\/p>\n<p>Steyer said California imposes only a 14-cent per barrel fee and that, even when property, income and corporate taxes are factored in, the state collects far less per barrel that states such as Texas and Alaska &#8211; a claim that oil industry representatives disputed.<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.reefrelieffounders.com\/drilling\/2013\/12\/17\/los-angeles-times-new-campaign-for-a-california-oil-extraction-tax-underway\/1386832_fi_monterey_shale_als\/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-5088\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.reefrelieffounders.com\/drilling\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/12\/la-me-ln-new-campaign-for-california-oil-extra-001.jpg\" alt=\"1386832_fi_monterey_shale_ALS\" width=\"600\" height=\"379\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-5088\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.reefrelieffounders.com\/drilling\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/12\/la-me-ln-new-campaign-for-california-oil-extra-001.jpg 600w, https:\/\/www.reefrelieffounders.com\/drilling\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/12\/la-me-ln-new-campaign-for-california-oil-extra-001-150x94.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.reefrelieffounders.com\/drilling\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/12\/la-me-ln-new-campaign-for-california-oil-extra-001-300x189.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>A wireline operator prepares a slick line at an oil pump jack site in the oil fields near Bakersfield. (Al Seib \/ Los Angeles Times \/ March 18, 2013)<\/p>\n<p>The extraction tax could produce billions of dollars in much-needed revenue for the state, Steyer said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s an obvious thing to do,&#8221; said Steyer, a billionaire who has been a leading campaigner against the proposed Keystone XL pipeline, designed to carry oil extracted from Canada&#8217;s tar sands to refineries along the Gulf Coast.<\/p>\n<p>Tupper Hull, spokesman for Western States Petroleum Assn., said an industry-supported analysis done two years ago found that oil companies already pay more than $6 billion a year in taxes to state and local governments. Hull said Steer&#8217;s assertion that the industry is under-taxed is &#8220;erroneous&#8221; and that imposing a new extraction tax would result in a decline in oil production in California and the loss of jobs.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;He supports a lot of policies that, intended or not, will make it harder and more costly to deliver petroleum energy to consumers in California and the rest of the country,&#8221; Hull said.<\/p>\n<p>Rock Zierman, chief executive of the California Independent Petroleum Assn., said a state oil extraction tax could also siphon away tax revenue that oil companies pay to local governments.<\/p>\n<p>The oil extraction tax proposal is similar to one voters defeated at the ballot box in November 2006.<\/p>\n<p>Proposition 87 would have imposed an extraction tax and used the revenue generated to fund research and development of alternative fuels. The oil industry spent just over $100 million to defeat the ballot measure. Recent legislative efforts to impose an extraction fee also have failed.<\/p>\n<p>Steyer and his political committee, NextGen Climate Action, are launching a statewide media campaign to raise awareness about the issue and, hopefully, prompt the state Legislature into action, he said. The organization also will conduct public opinion research.<\/p>\n<p>Steyer declined to say how much of his own money he expected to spend on the effort. <\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/local\/lanow\/la-me-ln-new-campaign-for-california-oil-extraction-tax-underway-20131216,0,3099963.story#ixzz2nh6eBIdw<\/p>\n<p>Special thanks to Richard Charter<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/local\/lanow\/la-me-ln-new-campaign-for-california-oil-extraction-tax-underway-20131216,0,3099963.story By Phil Willon December 16, 2013, 4:04 p.m. San Francisco Bay Area hedge fund manager Tom Steyer on Monday launched a statewide campaign, aimed at prompting action by state lawmakers, to impose a new extraction tax on oil produced in California. Steyer said California imposes only a 14-cent per barrel fee and that, even &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reefrelieffounders.com\/drilling\/2013\/12\/17\/los-angeles-times-new-campaign-for-a-california-oil-extraction-tax-underway\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Los Angeles Times:  New campaign for a California oil extraction tax underway<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[13,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5087","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-energy-policy","category-fossil-fuels"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reefrelieffounders.com\/drilling\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5087","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reefrelieffounders.com\/drilling\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reefrelieffounders.com\/drilling\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reefrelieffounders.com\/drilling\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reefrelieffounders.com\/drilling\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5087"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.reefrelieffounders.com\/drilling\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5087\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5090,"href":"https:\/\/www.reefrelieffounders.com\/drilling\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5087\/revisions\/5090"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reefrelieffounders.com\/drilling\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5087"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reefrelieffounders.com\/drilling\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5087"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reefrelieffounders.com\/drilling\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5087"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}